Increase FSA salaries by 50%, say headhunters

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 18 Jul 2011 | 10:20

Categories: Regulation

Topics: FSA

fsa-logo

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) should increase salaries by 50% at its successor agencies in order to prevent employees moving in to the private sector, according to one headhunting consultancy.

The firm said there was a particular need for higher salaries among staff paid between £100,000 and £250,000 as they have the experience to lead teams and stand up to the banks and carry out tougher, more interventionist regulation.

It added the regulator would need to increase its budget by around 35% to ensure the recruitment of quality staff, the Financial Times reports.

Nick Hedley, founding partner at Hedley May, said: "The good £250,000 person can move for £500,000 and the good £100,000 person can move to the private sector for £200,000. You need to close that gap.

"There are also plenty of people whom we talk to who say: ‘I thought about going to the regulator but I didn't want to take the pay cut.'

The FSA recently revealed its chairman and senior directors shared more than £2.6m in salaries, bonuses and benefits in the year to 31 March.

Chief executive Hector Sants' total earnings were £806,810, while chairman Adair Turner earned £500,276.

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Sants

If only Hector Sants with his £800k per year hadn't been such a complete and utter failure in his job, then this report may have been given some credence.

Posted by: MarkG

18 Jul 2011 | 11:34
Complain about this comment

Unbelievable

what world are these people living in, its not the same one as me thats for sure, I thought unemployment was high because there was a job shortage which you would think would keep salaries more realistic and stop the gravy train, my income has gone down by 25% part of this is because of the extra levies by,FSCS, FSA, Advice line, Data Protection, Credit license, PI increases etc etc the list is endless, when we were compulsory signed up for regulation no one said anything about about huge salaries, huge bonuses and final salary pensions, they should not have bonuses or pensions, they should pay for them themselves out of there huge salaries like the rest of us...like the government, councils, NHS and so on they have our money and can do what they like with it and we have no say whatsoever,

Posted by: Geoff

18 Jul 2011 | 11:45
Complain about this comment

Get Real

IF,and it is a BIG IF, they are good enough to get a higher salary in the private sector, they should go there immediately, what is stopping them? I suspect that it may be becuase to do so will require them to do more than tick boxes. Has the headhunter thought just where WE are going to get 50% extra to put into the gravy train? Perhaps the regulator encouraged them to spout forth this nonsense in the hopes that it looked better coming from them rather than the regulator. Personnally I think the FSA should pay US for having to put up with them!

Posted by: Afia

18 Jul 2011 | 11:55
Complain about this comment

What world do these people live on

Who does this person thinks pays these peoples salaries? We could all do with higher salaries and argue it might make us do a better job but it won't. They are already in the private sector anyway as they are paid by a levy on those in the private sector not by the taxpayer so it is all a load of rubbish anyway.

Posted by: Michael Fallas

18 Jul 2011 | 12:29
Complain about this comment

Cynical view?

Interesting that this came from a head hunting consultancy who by nature of their job get paid a percentage of someones salary for recruiting them. Of course they would like to see higher salaries then they could still move them to the private sector, demand even more money for them and subsequently get paid more themselves. Or am I just being cynical?

Posted by: Kev S

18 Jul 2011 | 13:25
Complain about this comment

Move Out

The FSA should move out of Canary Wharf and relocate somewhere where they can recruit quality people at a sensible price. They may also have a useful understanding of how most people in the UK live, which would be a bonus.

Posted by: Tom Scott

18 Jul 2011 | 13:31
Complain about this comment

Yeh, sure!

That would be a great idea if we could get rid of about three quarters of the idiots that work there. But that would only leave the cleaners . . . well, maybe not a bad idea after all. Re-hire Old Hector and put him to cleaning the toilets, now there's his real vocation.

Posted by: CHAY

18 Jul 2011 | 17:16
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints