The Financial Services Authority (FSA) should increase salaries by 50% at its successor agencies in order to prevent employees moving in to the private sector, according to one headhunting consultancy.
The firm said there was a particular need for higher salaries among staff paid between £100,000 and £250,000 as they have the experience to lead teams and stand up to the banks and carry out tougher, more interventionist regulation.
It added the regulator would need to increase its budget by around 35% to ensure the recruitment of quality staff, the Financial Times reports.
Nick Hedley, founding partner at Hedley May, said: "The good £250,000 person can move for £500,000 and the good £100,000 person can move to the private sector for £200,000. You need to close that gap.
"There are also plenty of people whom we talk to who say: ‘I thought about going to the regulator but I didn't want to take the pay cut.'
The FSA recently revealed its chairman and senior directors shared more than £2.6m in salaries, bonuses and benefits in the year to 31 March.
Chief executive Hector Sants' total earnings were £806,810, while chairman Adair Turner earned £500,276.
| Share | |
| Comment | Increase FSA salaries by 50%, say headhunters |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Unbelievable
what world are these people living in, its not the same one as me thats for sure, I thought unemployment was high because there was a job shortage which you would think would keep salaries more realistic and stop the gravy train, my income has gone down by 25% part of this is because of the extra levies by,FSCS, FSA, Advice line, Data Protection, Credit license, PI increases etc etc the list is endless, when we were compulsory signed up for regulation no one said anything about about huge salaries, huge bonuses and final salary pensions, they should not have bonuses or pensions, they should pay for them themselves out of there huge salaries like the rest of us...like the government, councils, NHS and so on they have our money and can do what they like with it and we have no say whatsoever,
Posted by: Geoff
Get Real
IF,and it is a BIG IF, they are good enough to get a higher salary in the private sector, they should go there immediately, what is stopping them? I suspect that it may be becuase to do so will require them to do more than tick boxes. Has the headhunter thought just where WE are going to get 50% extra to put into the gravy train? Perhaps the regulator encouraged them to spout forth this nonsense in the hopes that it looked better coming from them rather than the regulator. Personnally I think the FSA should pay US for having to put up with them!
Posted by: Afia
What world do these people live on
Who does this person thinks pays these peoples salaries? We could all do with higher salaries and argue it might make us do a better job but it won't. They are already in the private sector anyway as they are paid by a levy on those in the private sector not by the taxpayer so it is all a load of rubbish anyway.
Posted by: Michael Fallas
Cynical view?
Interesting that this came from a head hunting consultancy who by nature of their job get paid a percentage of someones salary for recruiting them. Of course they would like to see higher salaries then they could still move them to the private sector, demand even more money for them and subsequently get paid more themselves. Or am I just being cynical?
Posted by: Kev S
Move Out
The FSA should move out of Canary Wharf and relocate somewhere where they can recruit quality people at a sensible price. They may also have a useful understanding of how most people in the UK live, which would be a bonus.
Posted by: Tom Scott
Yeh, sure!
That would be a great idea if we could get rid of about three quarters of the idiots that work there. But that would only leave the cleaners . . . well, maybe not a bad idea after all. Re-hire Old Hector and put him to cleaning the toilets, now there's his real vocation.
Posted by: CHAY
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Sants
If only Hector Sants with his £800k per year hadn't been such a complete and utter failure in his job, then this report may have been given some credence.
Posted by: MarkG