Watchdog says IFA pension 'churning' continues

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 20 Jul 2011 | 06:45

Categories: TCF

Topics: churning| Pension| commission| Fees| multi-asset

Money give take

Personal pension 'churning' for higher commissions is still occurring among IFAs, according to a report published today which has been discredited by the trade body representing independent practitioners.

Consumer Focus, a statutory consumer watchdog, said it had uncovered evidence in a sample of 31 IFA contracts that advisers are unnecessarily switching clients' into products which carry higher charges, have bigger set-up costs or are higher-risk.

It said its findings, outlined in Is it advisable? An investigation into switching and advice in the individual personal pensions market, corroborate those contained in an FSA review into pension switching advice in 2008.

That study found unsuitable advice had been given in 16% of 500 cases it reviewed across 30 firms.

"The majority of customers were moved to more expensive products and more than one customer was sold a product that did not meet their stated expectations," the watchdog said of its latest findings.

"It is concerning that in no case was the client advised to take out a stakeholder pension."

Consumer Focus recommended the FSA carry out a market-wide investigation of the churning of personal pensions by IFAs "in order to identify mis-selling and take action to stop it".

But the Association of IFAs (AIFA) said the report was based on a "great deal of conjecture and speculation" and "appears to be very thin on evidence".

Andrew Strange, director of policy, said: "To make sweeping statements about pension switching is a gross injustice to the advice profession and will only serve to undermine consumer confidence.

"Extrapolating industry wide conclusions from only 31 individual samples of advice, for example, is not robust research. There is also no attempt to assess the value of the advice given."

Strange added the fact the report failed to consider the wider pensions market was "particularly disappointing".

"There are in excess of 10,000 financial advisers operating in banks, insurance companies and in tied capacities," he said. "Consumer Focus has inexplicably decided to ignore these entities."

Elsewhere, the report suggested IFAs are currently "building up" trail income ahead of remuneration changes being rolled out in January 2013.

Although the RDR will outlaw the payment of commission from providers to advisers on post-2012 new business, trail commission can continue to be paid on policies set up before the deadline.

According to Consumer Focus, it has evidence some consumers are signing up to paying trail commission to their adviser for the life of the product - "which may be decades" - without receiving any tangible benefit.

It recommends the FSA force insurance companies to "open their books" so it can review the current use of trail commission and take action to stop it where consumers are not benefiting.

"This needs to be done quickly as it appears that trail commission is increasing in advance of the expected RDR ban," it said.

More tcf news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Are you surprised?

It doesn't matter what percentage of advisers reach level 4 qualifications,a lifetime spent building up an income stream will not end because every adviser is rightly focused on protecting their livelihood. Advisers will carry on working in this way as any delayed method of implementation is going to cause problems. If I told my wife that we were going to get divorced at the end of next year,do you think that I may be able to tap on her shoulder during the night once or twice over the next 18 months whispering"for old times sake"? With regards to stakeholder pensions doesn't Consumer Focus realise that with the charges cap being lifted there are now a number of personal pensions on the Market that offer a better product for potentially lower charges. Stakeholder pensions killed the industry. If you don't pay advisers they can't do the job properly.their introduction sugnalked an end to face to face advice,and heralded the end of well funded Company Pensions. This industry should be reclaimed by financial services professionals . Send the lawyers and civil servants back to where they came from.

Posted by: Geoff Hartnell

20 Jul 2011 | 08:45
Complain about this comment

Been going on for years

This has been going on for years but the FSA seems incapable of doing anything about it, perhaps they feel NEST will solve this problem. Another failure of regulation and all the exams in the world won't stop this sort of thing, nor will charging fees either. One gets the impression the FSA and this Government really want consumers to buy online without advice or to buy Government approved products such as NEST. My worry with NEST is that will the many millions of low earners choose "safe funds" which may be invested in Gilts giving a big boost to Government coffers, which one could argue is not unlike a commission !! Will those gilts be so low risk as they have been in the past I wonder?

Posted by: Michael Fallas

20 Jul 2011 | 09:05
Complain about this comment

IFA churning

How many more "watchdogs" does this industry need. The FSA have already spent a fortune on a Pesnion Transfer Review. Why does it need one from another Quango. This industry has more people overseeing it than any other industry in the country.Why does everybody think we should work for free.

Posted by: terry

20 Jul 2011 | 09:30
Complain about this comment

IFAs should justify themselves

Cheap does not necessarily mean best. But the IFA should justify the additional charges by, as a minimum, a) benchmarking performance (to prove their management is worth the cost), and b) providing a defined review service.

Posted by: Chris Budd

20 Jul 2011 | 09:48
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints