McFall: Govt must cap workplace pension fees at stakeholder levels

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 01 Aug 2011 | 10:00

Categories: Pensions - Retail

Topics: pension reform| John McFall MP| NAPF| Tom McPhail| AMC

mcfall-lord-john-wric

The government must impose stakeholder-style caps on charges for auto-enrolment pensions or risk complaints over mis-selling, according to a new report.

Pension schemes chosen for auto-enrolment should have annual management charges (AMCs) of no more than 1.5% per annum for the first ten years and 1% thereafter, the Workplace Retirement Income Commission (WRIC) said.

WRIC, led by former Treasury Select Committee chair Lord McFall, also claimed charging structures on pension schemes are unreasonably high and "too opaque", rendering saving ineffective.

"Too many people are stuck in a complex, costly and inefficient system that relegates the consumer's interest to second place," said McFall, pictured.

"People need to get more bang for their buck, or they are not going to bother with a pension."

However, Tom McPhail, head of pensions research at Hargreaves Lansdown, criticized the current "preoccupation" with pension charges.

"Low charges are a good thing but not to the exclusion of member engagement," he said.

"Individual engagement with the personal responsibility of saving for retirement is the next big pensions challenge. If charges are cut too low then this engagement could be jeopardised."

Elsewhere in its report, WRIC claimed current minimum pension contributions set by the government for auto-enrolment schemes "will not be sufficient for many people" and recommended increasing the contribution floor after 2017.

Under auto-enrolment, the minimum contribution to each pension scheme member's pot, including employer, employee and tax relief, is 8%.

Neil Carberry, director for employment at the Confederation of British Industry, said: "Increasing the minimum compulsory pension contribution in 2017 is not the right answer.

"Further increases in the minimum contribution would put employers and employees under even greater financial pressure and may drive people away from pension saving altogether."

To read the full report, click here.

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints