Providers push Treasury to simplify pension/ISA transfers

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 03 Aug 2011 | 16:04

Categories: Pensions - Retail

Topics: Treasury| Hargreaves Lansdown| Suffolk Life| ISA| SIPP

treasury 1

SIPP providers, advisers and life offices have written to the Treasury pressuring it to allow simpler transfers of assets between savings vehicles.

In a letter seen by IFAOnline, Hargreaves Lansdown, Friends Life, Suffolk Life, Pointon York, LV= and AJ Bell have stressed the need for change to tax rules on transfers.

The letter comes after the Treasury promised to work on supporting simpler, more flexible workplace savings.

Over the last fortnight, the Treasury has held talks with industry figures to discuss the possibility of creating a link between pensions and ISAs.

Currently, to transfer assets between different vehicles such as pensions or ISAs an investor must sell their assets, move the money received into the new vehicle, and repurchase the assets.

In SIPPs, where some in-specie contributions are allowed, the receiving provider must create a debt which the individual's assets rectify, creating complications if the assets fall in value during the process.

The restriction is due to Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs' (HMRC) rule stating pension contributions must be defined as a monetary amount.

The letter reads: "These rules are a significant deterrent which we believe should be simplified in the interests of promoting personal financial responsibility and planning."

Tom McPhail, head of pensions research at Hargreaves Lansdown said the Treasury is not likely to approve any initiative to boost workplace saving which increases costs, but allowing in-specie transfers will not do so.

"Removing this barrier would be a way for the Treasury to help reinvigorate retirement saving at no cost to the taxpayer," said McPhail.

Greg Kingston, technical marketing manager at Suffolk Life, said: "The current system is absolutely crazy, and the customer suffers as a result."

 

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Simplified beyond common sense

Where do you draw the line in the rush to simplify what can be a complicated savings vehicle. Maybe with ISA's, but pensions would cause me some concerns. I still come across a lot of legacy plans that have guarantees, transfer penalties etc. I accept that life is more complicated than it used to be, but consolidating pensions into the one plan for ease of administration could mean the loss of some worthwhile benefits. Maybe if the pension providers took personal responsibility/liability for any transfers that were done without advice it might work. But I can see all sorts of problems; let's be honest, governments these days don't do simple, so it would probably cause more problems than it would solve.

Posted by: Ron Jones

04 Aug 2011 | 09:00
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints