Categories: Pensions - Retail
Topics: Treasury| Hargreaves Lansdown| Suffolk Life| ISA| SIPP
SIPP providers, advisers and life offices have written to the Treasury pressuring it to allow simpler transfers of assets between savings vehicles.
In a letter seen by IFAOnline, Hargreaves Lansdown, Friends Life, Suffolk Life, Pointon York, LV= and AJ Bell have stressed the need for change to tax rules on transfers.
The letter comes after the Treasury promised to work on supporting simpler, more flexible workplace savings.
Over the last fortnight, the Treasury has held talks with industry figures to discuss the possibility of creating a link between pensions and ISAs.
Currently, to transfer assets between different vehicles such as pensions or ISAs an investor must sell their assets, move the money received into the new vehicle, and repurchase the assets.
In SIPPs, where some in-specie contributions are allowed, the receiving provider must create a debt which the individual's assets rectify, creating complications if the assets fall in value during the process.
The restriction is due to Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs' (HMRC) rule stating pension contributions must be defined as a monetary amount.
The letter reads: "These rules are a significant deterrent which we believe should be simplified in the interests of promoting personal financial responsibility and planning."
Tom McPhail, head of pensions research at Hargreaves Lansdown said the Treasury is not likely to approve any initiative to boost workplace saving which increases costs, but allowing in-specie transfers will not do so.
"Removing this barrier would be a way for the Treasury to help reinvigorate retirement saving at no cost to the taxpayer," said McPhail.
Greg Kingston, technical marketing manager at Suffolk Life, said: "The current system is absolutely crazy, and the customer suffers as a result."
| Share | |
| Comment | Providers push Treasury to simplify pension/ISA transfers |
More pensions - retail news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
We all want certainty – and when it comes to auto-enrolment, advisers and their corporate...
Viewpoints
Clients now have a growing need for choice, flexibility and transparency when it comes to...
Simplified beyond common sense
Where do you draw the line in the rush to simplify what can be a complicated savings vehicle. Maybe with ISA's, but pensions would cause me some concerns. I still come across a lot of legacy plans that have guarantees, transfer penalties etc. I accept that life is more complicated than it used to be, but consolidating pensions into the one plan for ease of administration could mean the loss of some worthwhile benefits. Maybe if the pension providers took personal responsibility/liability for any transfers that were done without advice it might work. But I can see all sorts of problems; let's be honest, governments these days don't do simple, so it would probably cause more problems than it would solve.
Posted by: Ron Jones