Categories: Investment
Topics: financial services consumer panel| HM Treasury| simple products
Consumers who want or would benefit from buying a financial product must have access to a range of simple plans which "do what they say on the tin", the Financial Services Consumer Panel (FSCP) said today.
Research published by the panel suggests product complexity is a "significant stumbling block" for consumers who find the process of choosing the right product a stressful and "frequently unrewarding" experience.
In December, the Treasury called on product providers to develop ‘simple' deposit savings, life insurance and income protection products and launched a consultation over its proposals, which closed in March.
"The panel wants to see people given access to products that do what they say on the tin," FSCP chairman Adam Phillips said.
"We hope that research will encourage a debate within the industry, government and amongst consumers regarding the availability of products with straightforward outcomes."
Following the banking crisis and the PPI scandal, the panel said it is crucial trust is rebuilt in financial services.
"We think that the ability to buy products that have straightforward objectives and which deliver clearly-defined results will help to do this."
In its research, the panel set out likely criteria for product types meeting these objectives.
"In the future we look to the development of a range of straightforward outcome products which, depending on the individual consumer, could either be sold execution-only, or through an advice process." it said.
The Treasury's December consultation 2010 said there is a role for simple financial products which can be easily understood and compared in order to help consumers take responsibility for their finances.
It suggested simple products may be developed for specific groups, such as the elderly or first-time savers.
| Share | |
| Comment | Simple products must 'do what they say on tin': Consumer Panel |
More investment news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
I agree
I agree simple products make sense far more so than RDR. If all products did what they say on the tin we would not need the huge and very costly and burdensome regulation we have today and if the products were "regulated" with less needed on the advice side then we could all get on with helping consumers to save and protect their future as well and help the economy. If only our MP's were subject to the same regulations as we are then better qualified MP's would surely mean they would not have made such massive financial mistakes that everyone has to have to pay for for many generations? I doubt it would have made any difference but it would be nice to know we were all subject to the same rules and laws after all MP's make decisions which involve far larger sums of money than most IFA's. Why do we have to make everything so complicated just to save or protect one's future?
Posted by: Michael Fallas
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Rob Burdett, co-head of Thames River Multi-Capital, highlights some of the challenges facing...
Viewpoints
The darkest days of the recession following the financial crisis in late 2008 may be behind...
Mmmmm
Perhaps these chaps are unaware of the existence of savings accounts.
Posted by: Simon Kershaw