UK banks face US lawsuit over toxic mortgage debt

Author: IFAonline
IFAonline | 05 Sep 2011 | 07:15

Categories: Regulation

Topics: banks| investment banks| RBS| Barclays Bank| HSBC

rbs-tm-no-tag

RBS, HSBC and Barclays ignored warnings from third party advisers before selling on billions of dollars of toxic mortgage debt to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the lead-up to the financial crisis, court papers have alleged.

The Telegraph reports RBS is facing action over $30.4bn of sales, HSBC over $6.2bn and Barclays in relation to $4.9bn.

Documents released by the US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) claim Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and HSBC retained the services of Clayton Holdings, a risk analysis specialist, to scrutinise loans before they were placed in bundles of mortgage-backed securities.

According to the filings, reports from Clayton show 18% of the mortgage loans RBS submitted to Clayton between the first quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of 2007 were rejected. However, 53% of them were subsequently included in debt packages by the bank.

By contrast, 27% of the mortgage loans HSBC submitted to Clayton were rejected, although 62pc of these were eventually included.

RBS and HSBC are now among 17 banks being sued by US regulators to recoup the $196bn (£120bn) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac spent on mortgage-backed securities.

Analysts say it is still "far too early" to say what the eventual cost for the British banks will be, according to the Telegraph. However, they expect total settlements to reach hundreds of millions of dollars.

HSBC and Barclays refused to comment on the legal proceedings, while RBS said it planned to fight the legal action.

 

 

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Toxic Securities.

Mortgage backed securities were first issued by Fannie Mae in 1981 to the world's banks who then discovered they were toxic. Instead of suing Fannie Mae for fraud the world's banks preferred to receive bailouts from their respective countries. The Royal Bank of Scotland has learnt nothing from the past, and in April 2011 started to issue its own mortgage backed securities. Why was this not stopped by the Financial Services Authority?

Posted by: Peter L. Griffiths

12 Feb 2012 | 16:48
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints