VAT should extend to financial services, says IFS

Author: IFAonline
IFAonline | 14 Sep 2011 | 09:00

Categories: Charging| Pensions - Retail| Mortgages| Investment General| Adviser / Broking

Topics: IFS| National Insurance| Income tax| stamp duty| Corporation Tax| Council tax

pa-tax

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has proposed extending VAT to nearly all spending – including financial services – following its wide-ranging review into the UK’s tax system.

It said the UK applies a zero rate of VAT to far more goods and services that most other countries and believes a change could reduce complexity and, as a result of the extra money raised, lead to a reduction in income tax.

It pointed out it believes it would be "hard to apply" VAT to financial services in the same way it is applied to other goods and services, but it said a tax "broadly equivalent" to VAT should be applied.

The review also suggests inheritance tax (IHT) should be completely changed because it is ‘ineffective', and allows the wealthy to avoid paying it by exploiting loopholes. It recommended it should be switched to a system where the person who receives the inheritance is taxed, rather than a tax on the dead person's estate.

The five-year Mirrlees Review sought to identify the characteristics of a good tax system for the 21st century and to assess the extent to which the UK system conforms to those ideals.

It was carried out by a group of experts under the chairmanship of Nobel laureate Sir James Mirrlees.

Other recommendations include:

• Linking council tax to up-to-date values of homes, rather than a 1991 valuation, and abolishing stamp duty

• Merging income tax and National Insurance. Confusion of the system was clear when many basic rate taxpayers paid more in National Insurance contributions than income tax

• Making all savings tax free if they do not involve any risk, to avoid saving being discouraged by the tax system

• Changing corporation tax in order for businesses to avoid an excess reliance on debt

IFS director Paul Johnson said: "Successive governments have failed to set out a coherent strategy for tax. As a result the current set of taxes is complex and often incoherent and they impose a much greater cost on the economy than need be."

More charging news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Tax Reform

A lot of what they are saying makes sense. However, is this government really going to use the extra tax raised to reduce income tax? I don't think so. It will merely provide a reason to increase taxation once again. It makes sense that clients paying a fee for advice (a service) should pay VAT. Taxing the beneficiaries of an estate would speed up the settling of estates and make IHT a real tax, instead of a voluntary tax for the poorly informed. NI is just an Income Tax in disguise and should be merged.

Posted by: MarkG

14 Sep 2011 | 11:57
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints