Categories: TCF| Regulation
Topics: AWD Chase de Vere| FSA| fines
AWD Chase de Vere spent more than £1.5m settling complaints and paying customer redress last year, and expects the figure to be even higher this year.
The company's accounts for 2010 show it paid £1,519,627 on complaints. The figure includes an amount which is understood to be part of its ongoing customer redress programme after the FSA ruled it had mis-sold pensions between 2006 and 2007.
A total of £600,000 related to 'particular types of complaints', which were unspecified but which it said "currently have a high profile in the financial services industry".
The group had a complaints provision, as at 31 December 2010, of just under £5.2m to deal with redress payments associated with its past business review as well as 'business as usual' provisions.
Meanwhile, the company made an operating profit of £3.18m last year, up from £1.05m in 2009. This was from a turnover of £35.18m.
Average 'productivity per adviser' was up from £82,000 in 2009 to £118,000 in 2010, due to what it said was the 'active performance management of underperforming advisers'.
In November 2008, AWD Chase de Vere was fined £1.12m by the Financial Services Authority for "serious failings" in its pension transfer, pension annuity and income withdrawal business that resulted in mis-selling.
The firm estimated that as many as 800 of its customers may have received unsuitable advice in relation to 1,200 sales between February 2006 and October 2007.
AWD said it has reviewed past business and is compensating customers where appropriate.
| Share | |
| Comment | AWD Chase de Vere pays out £1.5m in complaints and redress |
More tcf news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
The numbers don't add up
Yet another confusing set of figures from AWD They where fined £1.2m in 2008 and received a £26m cash injection in Nov / Dec 2008 to sort this and their £16m loss. They then made a £1m profit in 2009 and in late 2010 their CEO was claiming "The productivity of our advisers has just gone through the roof and we are well on line to make £5.6 million for 2010" . Now it appears that less than 2 months later he has lost £2.4m of that profit and its down to just over £3m with a provision of a further £5m for complaints ! So, for all the supposed changes and cutbacks they still can't run a solvent business without their parent companies support - or is the bill for the 5 star foreign junkets for their top sales people , managers, directors and partners begining to take its toll ?
Posted by: Realist
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Client feedback is more than simply a way to validate what you do
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Active performance management?
'Active performance management of underperforming advisers' sounds like a whole world of fun. Based on the amount they are having to spend on complaints redress, maybe next year they can engage in a process of 'active suitability management' when giving advice?!
Posted by: Martin Bamford