ABI to tackle ‘payment for failure’ in boardrooms

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 28 Sep 2011 | 09:00

Categories: Regulation

Topics: Vince Cable| ABI| Better Business

boardroom-iw

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has today published guidelines attacking “payment for failure”.

The association, which last issued pay guidance in 2007, said boards of insurers should support "appropriate reward" for the performances of executives.

It warned "excessive or undeserved remuneration undermines the efficient operation of the company".

The guidance comes after business secretary Vince Cable reiterated his pledge at the Liberal Democrat conference to tackle excessive pay cultures.

Bonuses should be held back after "exceptionally negative events" such as market crashes, the ABI said.

Overall pay for board members should be compared to pay at other companies to prevent spiralling remuneration, the association said.

Otto Thoresen, director general of the ABI, said: "Effective boardrooms should be the powerhouse of the UK economy.

"The board effectiveness report and long standing remuneration guidelines aim to ensure remuneration is linked to performance and shareholders' interests are protected.

"We continue to favour evolution, building on what we have learnt from recent years to make sure companies act in shareholder's interests and deliver long term economic growth that will benefit society as a whole."

 

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Peurile gesture by ABI

Teh ABI knows full well that where the bigest salaries are that seem to remain unchanged even when there is clear failure to deliver, that their influence has diminished substantially to what it was 10 years ago. Now with mico second programmes trading for the sake of trading, and owership so widely held internationally, by index funds, and money managers. What the ABI says is soemtimes of interest but of little net value. Cable's premise is bang on right, but which remuneration committee member will raise the issue when their remuneration is being decided by those no executives who will sit on his board. It's all far too insestuous and until that is cleared out sweet nothing will change.

Posted by: Robert Marshall

28 Sep 2011 | 14:15
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints