Categories: Regulation
Topics: Europe| European Commission
The draft Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) published today limits the ban on receiving commission payments from product providers to independent financial advisers.
The paper is at the Level 1 stage of being drafted and will now go out to the governments of the 27 member states for further negotiation. It will then need to be passed by the European Commission and adopted by the European Parliament.
If implemented in their current form, the rules would seem to allow restricted advisers to escape from the Financial Services Authority's changes to the adviser charging rules under RDR, which ban commission payments in favour of fees and are due to come into force in January 2013.
However, Peter Snowdon, partner at law firm Norton Rose, said the draft rules will be subject to fierce wranglings by member states, including the UK.
"Could MiFID II steal the RDR's thunder? Potentially but I think there is still much political negotiation ahead on this point," he said.
Today's paper stated: "In order to strengthen the protection of investors and increase clarity to clients as to the service they receive, it is appropriate to further restrict the possibility for firms to accept or receive inducements from third parties, and particularly from issuers or product providers, when providing the service of investment advice on an independent basis and the service of portfolio management."
In such cases, only limited "non-monetary benefits" such as training on the features of the products should be allowed subject to the condition that they do not impair the ability of investment firms to pursue the best interest of their clients, the paper continued.
The draft rules are in stark contrast to the FSA's hardline approach to a total ban on commission payments for all advisers.
An FSA spokesperson said: "We welcome the Commissions' work on the update of MiFID and the aim of improving investor protection."
| Share | |
| Comment | MiFID draft limits commission ban to IFAs |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
More FSA Stupidity
It looks like MiFID may bring some sense into the madness that is the FSA's latest bid to keep them all in overpaid and useless jobs. When will this Government realise that the FSA exists mainly to keep its employees in overpaid work. Didnt Gordon Brown employ an army of public workers to keep unemployment down and ensure more votes for the labour party - this is exactly what the FSA is about - one huge initiative after another and now they are joined by Hobon another useless individual. Never mind that they are ruining perfectly good and honest businesses that provide a genuine service to their clients. If i read one more piece of news from this lot I think i'll go mad!
Posted by: Knowledgeable insider
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Money makes the world go around
A non-remunerative world in which there is no incentive to be innovative is nothing short of stupidity.Simple concept nowt sold, nowt happens just U-turn and insist on signed client propositions for fees or commission, it would have saved millions already. Never mind, at least we've got a regulator protecting the consumer from detriment. Sorry,nearly forgot about the consumer having to bail out the banks and then pick up the tab!
Posted by: Peter Taylor