FSA presses court for ‘urgent' decision on Arch Cru IFA judicial review

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 21 Oct 2011 | 10:15

Categories: Investment

Topics: FSA| Capita| Arch cru| Hector Sants

justice-cutout

The Financial Services Authority has asked the High Court to make an "urgent" decision on whether a group of IFAs can judicially review the £54m Arch Cru investors payment scheme.

Six IFAs, who all recommended clients to invest in the funds, are backing a request made in September in the name of IFA Coull Money asking for a judicial review of the FSA-brokered deal which has contributions by Capita, HSBC and BNY Mellon.

The group argues the scheme, which caps the three companies' contribution at about 34% of investors' capital and restricts claims at the Financial Ombudsman Scheme against them to the same amount, leaves IFAs exposed to compensation claims for the outstanding amount.

No decision to grant the review has yet been reached by the Administrative Court. But a note on the case file stated the court had received an application from the defendant - the FSA - asking for the permission decision to be dealt with "urgently".

The court could not give an indication of when a decision would be made.

Foot Anstey, the law firm advising the IFAs on their action, has previously acted for the Arch Capita Compensation Group (ACCG), set up by Cru founder Jon Maguire.

Cru, which marketed the Arch fund range to advisers, has been heavily criticsed for its role in promoting the funds as low-risk.

Alan Hughes, partner at Foot Anstey, denied the association creates a conflict of interest: "We have acted for ACCG in the past but now act for the investors who were part of that group individually.

"We don't see there is a conflict or we wouldn't be acting," he said.

Manchester law firm Pannone is seeking to bring professional negligence claims against IFAs who invested clients in Arch Cru, following Treasury Secretary Mark Hoban's refusal yesterday to launch a government inquiry into Capita's role.

The FSA has said the deal, combined with non-guaranteed future distributions from the winding down of the fund range, will return 70% of investors' capital and represents a "good outcome". Chief executive Hector Sants has advised investors to take the deal, and drop their fight for 100% redress.

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Whiffy

This entire episode, as with Keydata, emanates a most unpleasant aroma!

Posted by: Duncan Carter

21 Oct 2011 | 11:06
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints