Categories: Regulation| Better Business
Topics: Hector Sants| FSA| Financial Conduct Authority| margaret cole| PPI
Mass mis-selling on the scale of the payment protection insurance (PPI) debacle will not be possible under the Financial Services Authority's replacement, the man who will head up the body has said.
Martin Wheatley, current managing director of the consumer and markets business unit at the Financial Services Authority (FSA), and who will become head of the new Financial Conduct Authority, said the FCA will be better at protecting consumers from mis-selling and poor products.
Wheatley today told the Treasury Select Committee (TSC) the FCA will scrutinise new products at an earlier stage in their design to improve consumer outcomes.
He said the FCA, had it been in place at the time, would have tackled the PPI problem far earlier than the FSA did.
"We would have been looking at the production of PPI and its governance and analysing its profitability," said Wheatley, pictured.
"If we saw profits of 70%, we would have been intrusive."
Hector Sants, chief executive of the FSA, said the FSA has very different powers of intervention to those the FCA will have.
"We could have done the research [into PPI], but we did not have the same philosophy then," he said.
Margaret Cole, managing director of the FSA's conduct business unit, added the new regulator will have the power to ban products if it believes they are damaging to consumers.
Wheatley's comments come after the FSA and the Office of Fair Trading published landmark guidance on designing PPI today.
| Share | |
| Comment | FCA chief: Mass mis-selling not possible under new regulator |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Epic Fail
So, the answer is always more authoritarianism by unellected functionaries of limited ability is it? In other words the FCA will de fcat nationalise financial product manufacture. Just look around you. When has any of these ramshackle bureaucracies ever produced anything useful? Furthermeore if it risible to think that a few unacountable functionaries possess unique and superior wisdomw than the rest of the population. Final point. 'Mis-selling' is a weasel word. It is built on the Newspeak technique straight out of 1984. Which the Failed FSA has been using as a manual as opposed to a caution.
Posted by: Steven Farrall
Cock eyed optimist!
Ah – what Hubris! Let us hope that Nemesis doesn’t follow – we the regulated can’t afford it! Let’s mix our metaphors. Pride cometh before a fall – and he hasn’t even started yet!
Posted by: Harry Katz
Bad Start
How can a regulator claim to be able to prevent misselling by examining the profitability of products? No mention of the Elephant in the Room - bank sales staff.
Posted by: Green Eyed Monster
I wonder
How long it will take for this bloody fool to have to eat his words. 'And God said I will send a plague upon the Financial Services Industry managed by fools of the highest order and call it regulation'.
Posted by: M J Winfield
Foolish or bold?
i don't know much about this man but his claims are either supported by insider knowledge of just what the FCA is going to unleash come 1.1.13, or he is wildly optimistic. What however does come through in the style of language being used by all the current FSA mandarins, is that there will in practice be very little change in culture come the day. All a bit depressing really
Posted by: Duncan Carter
Some hope
Mr Wheatley, does this mean that when there is a mass mis-sell you will put your hand up, say sorry and pay the compensation yourself. You better start saving.
Posted by: KS
Strong words
Strong words, probably because by the time they have finished no one will be left to sell anything, no one will want to save and any business will be done online without advice !! Regulation doesn't work and one can only hope one day some bright spark in their midst will realise that but probably not until the majority have been bankrupted by their never ending failures. If it works why are we all in the worst financial crisis for many many decades?
Posted by: Michael Fallas
The man's a fanny
From a long line of Fanny's
Posted by: Paul Burnside
Breast Implants?
No doubt this guy will end up regulating breast implants! He could put a stop to ALL mis-selling. Imagine all Cosmetic Surgeons having to pay the costs of removing breast implant products they did not use, because they considered them inferior quality, while their competitors coined in the cash. (Keydata?) Let alone expecting them to rectify the shoddy work they DID do. It is time that IFAs and the Financial Services industry generally were treated in exactly the same way as other industries (or vice versa). Give us a break !
Posted by: Grosvenor
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
This man is a dangerous fool
I find it hard to accept Martin Wheatley could possibly have such blind faith in the ability of regulation to protect the public in the face of such overwhelming evidence to the contrary. We sit here in the teeth of a recession with markets tumbling all around us - much of which was the direct result of poor regulatory oversight - and this fool clings to the notion that regulation can be effective. The only certainty is that regulation will fail to protect the public but not before it has given a false impression of safety. The question is not if regulation will fail to prevent mis-selling but when and it would be less disingenuous if Mr Wheatley started his tenure by accepting this
Posted by: Richard Ross