Categories: Structured Products
Topics: FSA| structured products
Structured product providers must consider the needs of the retail consumer at the end of the supply chain and not just regard distributors as the ‘end customer', the FSA has said.
The FSA has criticsed structured product providers for accepting only limited responsibility for product distribution and relying wholly on distributors to identify the appropriate target market, creating an increased risk of mis-selling.
Its findings, published today, follow the regulator's recent review of the structured product market.
The regulator wants structured product providers to review whether distribution in practice corresponds to what was originally planned
or envisaged for distributing their products, given the target market.
Providers should also carry out initial and ongoing due diligence on distributors, the FSA said, to ensure that products are reaching their target market.
Structured product providers should act on their assessments of distributors, for example by amending consumer or adviser literature for future product tranches, providing enhanced training for distributors, ceasing to use a particular distribution channel, or limiting distribution to specific channels.
The FSA also wants providers to consider whether they should take any remedial action if there are serious problems, for example reviewing sales of other products within the distribution channel or investigating a particular
distributor.
Firms with wholly intermediated distribution strategies had a "significantly higher risk profile", it said.
Providers should collect and analyse appropriate information so the firm can detect patterns in distribution compared with the planned
target market, and can assess the performance of the channels through which its products are being distributed, the FSA said.
| Share | |
| Comment | FSA: Providers must share struct prod suitability duty with advisers |
More structured products news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
A riddle inside an enigma
I have taken the FSA strictures to heart and being resolved to remain independent have eschewed my bigotry and looked again at structured products. I have just recommended one as part of an overall portfolio (about 6%) and whilst it is fairly straightforward explaining OEICS, ITs and even bonds, the explanation of these takes a hugely disproportionate amount of space (and time). The literature is bigger than the Local Business pages directory and about as easy to comprehend and String Theory. That the client may get an enhanced income provided the FTSE doesn’t drop when the moon is on the wane and the mistletoe is in full bloom, rather makes one wonder why we bother.
Posted by: Harry Katz
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Investments generally carry two key risks, systematic risk and unsystematic risk.
Viewpoints
Watch Gary Dale and Lawrence Gosling discuss where structured investments could and should...
Confusing for clients
Why these products where never regulated in the first place I never knew. Whilst the deposit based plans offer capital guarentees the indexes that they are often linked to and early kick outs are extremely confusing to the client if explained poorly.
Posted by: Colin Abbott