Pension reform will force employers to cut benefits

IFAonline | 02 Nov 2011 | 13:55

Categories: Personal Accounts| Employee Benefits

Topics: employers| CBI| auto-enrolment| NEST

carberry-neil-cbi

Auto-enrolment will force small employers to reduce benefits and potentially freeze recruitment to meet rising pension costs, trade bodies have warned.

Speaking at a House of Commons work and pensions select committee hearing this morning, a number of employer organisations raised concerns about the level of costs for small and micro-businesses.

British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) director general John Longworth said small businesses would find it "extraordinarily difficult" to meet the demands of auto-enrolment.

He said: "To handle this will be extremely difficult for small businesses even if they can grasp the implications and deal with the bureaucracy, they will find it extraordinarily difficult to meet the demands and implement it.

"Many will have to depress other benefits and remuneration packets."

He said it was important to "minimise the consequences" of auto-enrolment so that it didn't stop businesses from hiring new employees.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) head of policy Graeme Fisher raised concerns about the administrative costs for small firms.

He said: "The main concerns are around administration costs for small businesses to run a scheme. The main point being that small businesses are not experts on pensions policy."

Fisher said the reforms had moved away from Lord Turner's original recommendations and become too complex.

Confederation of British Industry director of employment policy Neil Carberry, pictured, said The Pensions Regulator had an important role to play in engaging small businesses.

He said: "The single biggest challenge is to get the regulator to speak the language of small employers. To come with the arm around the shoulder before the big stick comes out. That's the critical thing for us."

Trades Uunion Congress head of campaigns and communications Nigel Stanley said employers could not be relied upon to choose the best scheme for their employees through market incentives alone.

He said: "We need a regulatory regime which if employers make choices not around very lowest possible charges and not around deferred member penalties then employers need a very good reason for not offering that very best deal to their staff. We are not there yet.

"Relying on the good intentions of employers works, but it doesn't work all the time."

More personal accounts news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Excuses

Sounds like another excuse to me. Some employers have used the recession not to give payrises and improve benefits for employees. Employers with less than 5 employees are excluded anyway as I understand. Benefits for employees have been getting worse for a number of years. Its time employers started to appreciate their employees.

Posted by: R Whitehead

04 Nov 2011 | 08:31
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints