Divisions emerge on post-2012 fund charging

Author: Investment Week
IFAonline | 08 Nov 2011 | 08:30

Categories: Charging| Regulation

Topics: L&G| Schroders| Standard Life| M&G| Fidelity| Investec

clark-andrew-hsbc

Investors could be faced with a plethora of fund charging models post-RDR as well as higher overall costs and ‘premium’ prices for a top tier of better performing funds or specialist mandates.

Fund groups are working on developing pricing structures for their ranges to meet requirements post-2012. However, divisions are opening up between providers and platforms on how best to meet investors’ demands.

Momentum is also building behind a sliding charging structure for funds based on performance, with higher alpha products priced at a premium, leading to greater differentiation between funds.

Many industry experts already forecast costs will increase for consumers post-RDR. They say the traditional total annual management charge of 1.5% will be scrapped and overall charges may rise nearer the 2% mark. Fund groups currently take around 0.75% with the rest split between platforms and advisers.

In many cases, commission will be taken out of the equation but investors will still have to factor in varying platform charges, possibly higher advice costs, as well as a spectrum of prices across a provider’s range and between similar mandates from rival fund houses. This will make effective comparisons increasingly difficult.

Simon Ellis, L&G Investment Management managing director of unit trusts, said: “I think the average cost to the consumer will go up because the total cost of the value chain rises with the removal of trail commission. Whether funds remain at 2% AMC will be answered within two years of RDR,” he said.

Platforms are also making different requirements for fund groups, with Cofunds requesting the lowest possible ‘clean’ share class, without commission or platform charges, while rival platform giants FundsNetwork and Skandia will allow greater flexibility.

Continuing uncertainty over whether platform rebates will be allowed post-RDR is also adding to the confusion.  

Schroders has already said it will offer a ‘clean’ share class with around a 0.75% AMC alongside its existing share classes.

Investment Week can reveal Standard Life Investments (SLI) is planning to offer three share classes for investors in Q1 next year: the existing retail class, institutional and a clean ‘Z’ class. 

Jacqueline Kerr, head of UK wholesale at SLI, said: “Post-RDR many managers will look at what they can deliver.

“There are obviously lots of rumours advisers will increase their charges – but we do not know if this will be substantiated or whether the platforms will seek to put up their charges.

“One thing we know for sure is pricing will become transparent. I am sure there will be some funds that will go up in price and some will go down depending on what their market positioning is.

“We have a number of funds priced above the 1.5% AMC, such as Ed Legget’s UK Unconstrained fund at 1.8%, but we have a number of funds, such as the MyFolio range below 1.5% at 1.3%.”

Page 1 of 2

More charging news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

the road to ruin is paved with good intentions

The irony of unintended consequences?

Posted by: Duncan Carter

08 Nov 2011 | 09:09
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints