Capita: Value of remaining £149m in Arch Cru unknown

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 17 Nov 2011 | 15:01

Categories: Investment| Investment General

Topics: Arch cru| Private equity| FSA| HSBC| BNY Mellon

money-down-drain

Capita Financial Managers, which wants Arch Cru investors to accept a payoff linked to the sale of assets from the suspended fund range, has admitted that three-quarters of the remaining value of the cells is uncertain.

In accounts for the year to 31 March 2011, published on Monday, the authorised corporate director of the funds said there was now "significant difficulty and uncertainty" in ascertaining the recoverable amounts of the cell's investments.

For the CF Arch Cru Diversified Investment funds, it states: "In respect of investment assets carried in the balance sheet of the company of £36m there is uncertainty over approximately 70% of the value."

With the CF Arch Cru Investment funds there is uncertainty over approximately 75% of the value of £113m assets, it states.

The accounts confirmed that the sale in September of some of the private equity assets from Guernsey cells to JP Morgan Private Equity Ltd (JPEL) at a discount will cause a fall in the net asset values of some of the sub-funds.

The JPEL transaction disposed of a number of the Arch Cru cells' private equity assets for £56.5m of shares in JPEL.

The Arch Cru accounts cast further doubt on claims by Capita, BNY Mellon, HSBC Bank and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) that a deal brokered by the four will return 70% of capital held in the funds at March 2009 to investors, when added to amounts already paid out and the value of the remaining assets of the funds.

Investors have lodged a request at the High Court to judicially review the £54m deal - which FSA chief executive Hector Sants has encouraged them to accept - on the grounds it is unfair and lacking in transparency.

Of the £54m contributed to the payment scheme, £38.3m is allocated to investors in the CF Arch Cru Investment Funds and £15.7m to investors in the CF Arch Cru Diversified Investment Funds.

Gareth Fatchett, partner at Regulatory Legal Solicitors, which lodged the request on behalf of 2,700 investors, said: "The whole premise of the 70% of pre-suspension price is that it would be achievable. Capita managed this down to 65% and this downgrade makes this figure seem very optimistic.

"Our view is that the managed sale of CF Arch Cru assets will produce a significantly-worse return than predicted. To invite investors to release Capita from any liability first and then hope for a miracle is entirely unfair"

Elsewhere in the fund accounts, Capita stated information from Spearpoint, which took over management of the cells from Arch, forecast that Capita would be able to make a further capital distribution to investors in December.

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

unfair and unreasonable offer

Just shows that the FSA/CAPITA offer is anything but fair and reasonable. Why do reporters say the offer attempts to return 70% of investor’s money? The mythical 70% is 70% of a fictitious figure as at 13th March 2009. Hugh Aldous chairman of the SPL Guernsey funds has stated the true values at March 2009 are unknown. The simple fact is that, even if Spearpoint sold the remaining assets at the perceived value of a few weeks ago the best investors could hope for over the next 5 years is 50% of what they invested. Based on the above report 50% now looks like a pipedream. What this report also proves is that CAPITA had no idea what the actual underlying assets of the CISX quoted companies they were investing in were, and therefore could not have known whether the OEIC complied with COLL sourcebook regulations. When Neil Woodford invests in a quoted company does he invest just because he likes the name of the company? no, he researches the company speaks to the management and forms an opinion on whether he should invest. Financial Advisers have the right to expect that when Mr Woodford makes his decisions that they have been done professionally and diligently and his fund holdings are as stated in his marketing literature. The adviser can then decide whether investing in UK equities meet the client risk profile and assess Mr. Woodfords funds against other UK equity funds without having to worry whether the fund has in fact invested in Greek Shipping. If CAPITA or their delegate fund manager had been doing their job correctly then they would not have continued to invest in the CISX quoted companies during 2007 and 2008, as Mr. Aldous states there were clearly question to be answered by the CISX quoted companies back then.

Posted by: s.a

18 Nov 2011 | 11:17
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints