FSA plans ban on ‘toxic' Keydata-style traded life policy funds

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 28 Nov 2011 | 10:36

Categories: Investment

Topics: Keydata

fsa-logo

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has said it plans to ban the sale and promotion of "toxic" traded life settlement policies because they are high risk and generally unsuitable for the majority of UK retail investors.

The FSA aims to consult on a ban next year to help "erase" the risks the investments pose, it said.

TLPIs - like those invested in by failed firm Keydata - invest in a pooled investment or fund which invests in US life insurance policies.

In a statement the FSA referred to the investments as "death bonds".

A TLPI investor is betting on when a particular set of US citizens will die and if these people live longer than expected then the investment may not function as expected, the FSA said.

According to the regulator, it has found evidence of significant problems with the way in which TLPIs are designed, marketed and sold to UK retail investors.

Many of these products have failed, causing loss for UK retail investors, most notably Keydata.

Margaret Cole, FSA managing director, said:"TLPIs are toxic products which pose significant risks for retail investors.

"The failure of these products in the past has led to significant consumer detriment and we fear new investors will suffer unless we take the necessary steps now to prevent their sale and distribution."

"We are issuing a strong warning to the industry not to market these products to UK retail investors.

Ultimately the FSA aims to ban TLPIs from being marketed to UK retail investors, she said.

Today's guidance should remind firms of the importance of assessing whether a product is suitable for a customer and whether promotional material makes risk warnings clear enough, said Cole.

"Firms should not be selling these high risk products to retail investors," she said.

Cole said products such as TLPIs are not a simple problem for the FSA to address as many of them are based outside of the UK, and so are outside the FSA's jurisdiction.

"There are also considerations under EU law that will affect what we can do. However, the FSA is engaging in discussions in Europe around the MiFID review, AIFM Directive and with other European supervisors to find a solution to give greater consumer protection against these products.

"For now, we want to make our message about these products clear - they are completely unsuitable for most UK retail investors."

The guidance consultation is open for feedback until 23 January 2012.

What the FSA is asking firms to do:

• Consider the significant risks of TLPIs and be aware that they should not be promoted to UK retail investors;
• Conduct extensive research and be able to provide robust justification in the unlikely event they think TLPIs might be suitable for a particular retail investor;
• Be aware of underlying assets within the investments they recommend. For example, know whether a TLPI is an underlying asset within another investment e.g. a fund of funds; and
• They should not recommend products they do not fully understand.
The key risks of TLPIs are outlined in the guidance paper and can be found on the FSA consumer section of the website.

The FSA said key risks include:
• The product structure is complex and opaque, involving several firms working together, often in different jurisdictions. The different roles and legal responsibilities are not always clear and so there is a risk that firms may not be meeting their obligations. For instance, offshore entities may require the approval of local regulators and it may be difficult to ascertain if the correct approvals have been given;
- The underlying assets expose investors to high levels of risk:
• If the people whose lives are assured live longer than expected, perhaps because of incorrect actuarial assumptions or new medical advances, the investments may not be able to function as expected;
- We have found that some TLPIs lack sufficient liquidity to meet ongoing costs if the people whose life policies they've bought live longer than expected;
- If the TLPI provider needs to sell assets to raise funds, they may find it difficult to sell the underlying policies at a reasonable price, due to the small market and its specialised nature, and this may lead to losses for investors;
- If the firm needs to sell the assets and cannot find a buyer quickly, this could also mean that investors find their money locked into a TLPI for longer than expected; and
- If the underlying assets of the TLPI are based offshore there is also an exchange rate risk, both in terms of the costs of meeting ongoing premiums and the final payout for the underlying insurance contracts.
• Investors may have limited or no recourse to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) and Financial Ombudsman Service as many TLPIs are located offshore.

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Construct a phrase ...

... containing the following words: Stable Door Horse Bolted

Posted by: Neil F Liversidge

28 Nov 2011 | 10:56
Complain about this comment

220 hindsight vision

It's easy to be wise with hindsight. As usual our regulator has entered the debate after the damage has been done, having allowed various product manufacturing companies to the flood the market with these things using clever marketing that claims they are safe, with lots of facts and statistics to support their claims (i.e. Key Data, Arch Cru, TLP's, UCIS's etc.). When will the FSA (or future FCA) stop these products from being distributed to IFAs in the first place? It's then the IFAs who then get a good kicking, the FSA's having allowed these products to be marketed in the first place. The FSA needs to start accepting more responsibility and stop companies promoting these products in the UK in first place rather than going after IFAs who have promoted "safe" branded products in good faith - it's too easy to be wise in hindsight!

Posted by: Mr C

28 Nov 2011 | 10:56
Complain about this comment

Squeaky clean

The FSA is trying to make itself look squeaky clean. They had concerns about Keydata in 2005 apparently and did not tell the industry about it. Its all part of a wider campaign to shift the blame elsewhere (as usual) Toxic regulator more like!

Posted by: grumpa saurus

28 Nov 2011 | 11:02
Complain about this comment

THE USUAL HIPOCRACY

CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHAT IS THE POINT OF A REGULATOR THAT CALLS 'TOXIC' A PREVIOUSLY REGULATED PRODUCT??? OF COURSE WITH A TRACK RECORD OF DOING NOTHING TO DETER 130% MORTGAGES, SUCH HYPOCRICY IS PROBABLY ONLY TO BE EXPECTED. JUST A THOUGHT, WHY WASN'T FSA CITED UNDER THE FSCS TORT ACTION ON KEY DATA???

Posted by: CLIFF

28 Nov 2011 | 11:07
Complain about this comment

not all TLP funds are the same

Keydata failed due to high commission levels paid out to various providers and the fact that some of the money in the fund was miss-managed. It had very little to do with the underlying fund made up of TLPs. Please look at the background before making broad brush stroke comments to write off a whole asset class.

Posted by: Tony Catt

28 Nov 2011 | 11:13
Complain about this comment

Contradictions at Every Level

At a time when the Bank of England is actively encouraging investors to take more risk by driving down the value of gilts, we have the FSA driving in the opposite direction and discouraging risk indiscrimately. It is a sad comment on the quality of the FSA that they cannot differentiate between those funds that manage life expectancy risk well and those that don't.

Posted by: M N Hunt

28 Nov 2011 | 12:22
Complain about this comment

Too late, mate!

The FSA did an Arrow visit on ArchCru and found nothing wrong, as confirmed to an IFA who specifically asked the FSA for assurance on behalf of his clients.(See other stories)But at least one of the Cru funds is part invested in the Assured Fund, which is a TLS based in Cayman Islands. If it was OK then why isn't it OK now? Or if it was not OK when the FSA did their inspection why didn't they do something then? More to the point, do they even know who owns the Assured Fund or were they and Capita happy to just take it at face value; a value now 30% reduced by an exit penalty on top of all the other insults showered on the hapless Cru investors.

Posted by: Caramba!

28 Nov 2011 | 18:37
Complain about this comment

Stable Door?

While one cannot really argue against this, one wonders whether we are having regulation by hindsight. Anyone going forward who may invest in these does so at their peril, but isn’t it a different situation for those who suggested these 4, 5 and more years ago? True it will be hard to justify (but not impossible bearing in mind the amount of income on offer) putting a sizeable chunk of a clients wherewithal into these. However as we continually have examples thrust at us at what happens elsewhere, it is interesting to note that the Life Settlements are big business in the US. Is the FSA saying that the US Regulators are more lax or that these products don’t work there? Bear in mind that under due diligence utilising US Life Settlements was ‘a good thing’ as the insurers in these cases (unlike in the UK) are in the last event underwritten by the US Government. Furthermore doesn’t all this frenetic action by the Regulator at this late stage rather have a bit of a whiff about it? As I said, odd and even stranger. It will no doubt keep us all diverted for some considerable time to come and meanwhile the usual suspects will be creaming it. (Yep – the lawyers – who else?).

Posted by: Felix Godwyn

28 Nov 2011 | 19:47
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints