Categories: Wrap/platforms
Topics: fund platform| FSA| fund managers
The FSA’s understanding of the platform industry has again been called into question after it sent an “odd” questionnaire to operators quizzing them on their relationship with fund managers.
The questionnaire asked platform providers about the value they provide to the fund management community.
It is part of the regulator's ongoing research on platform remuneration ahead of a likely ban on both fund manager and cash rebates.
One industry figure said the questionnaire was "odd" and "confusing" and highlighted the watchdog's thin understanding of platform-related issues.
"The underlying issue is the FSA does not fully understanding what is going on," said the insider.
"We thought the question about what value platforms add to fund managers was particularly odd. We are all a bit confused and I think there will be a lot of frustration from the industry in the early part of the new year."
The regulator is receiving conflicting messages from different segments of the industry, he said.
"I think a lot of these issues relate to people trying to protect a legacy position which is intellectually unsustainable."
Another figure echoed the sense of confusion arising from the questionnaire.
"We have been trying to work out exactly what it means so we are going to have to make some assumptions and send it back," he said.
The latest development in the FSA's ongoing probe of the platform industry comes after IFAonline revealed the watchdog deployed the services of Big Four Accountancy firm Deloitte to help with its research into platform rebates.
The revelation raised concerns over both the cost of the FSA's research and its understanding of the platform market.
| Share | |
| Comment | FSA presses platforms to explain their value |
More wrap/platforms news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Yes Harry .....and how much does it cost to outsource to the big 4
Yes Harry, we would love to see FSA get "its act together" but what is more worrying is the sheer casual approach of wasting money by using the BIG 4 Accountancy practices to undertake the research. Just think of the cost. Big 4 are all in the 'gang' of extracting as much money from us advisers and customers as possible. Great business and easy money if you can get it. And Sants & Turner are too weak to put a stop to it !!
Posted by: Graham
Double your money
This is why regulation is so expensive. We pay twice. Once to the regulator, then again to the Big 4, who are the most expensive in the country. All because, in the words of Adair "the regulator is not clever enough....."
Posted by: skint
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
M&G have announced a major step forward for the popular iView channel, which has seen it...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Oh really!
It would seem that Adair Turner has more problems with the perspicacity of his staff than even he realised. If the Canaries even have to ask what the value of having a platform is, one must really wonder if they are suited for the job at all? What sort of supervision is there at this organisation that such initiatives are even allowed to see the light of day? I’m afraid it points to poor staff and por management. I’m sure we are all getting weary of criticising the Regulator and no doubt they are getting wearry of us doing so, but for heavens sake – get your act together and if you can do it right don’t do it at all.
Posted by: Harry Katz