FSA wins £200k from illegal landbanking scheme in High Court

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 15 Dec 2011 | 11:20

Categories: Investment| Investment General

Topics: FSA

justicecara

The Financial Services Authority has secured a High Court decision against an unauthorised land banking firm, and repayment to victims of £200,000.

On 9 December 2011 the FSA secured a summary judgment in the High Court against Cityshore Commodities Limited and its director Aaron Walker.

The judgment confirmed Cityshore sold land illegally to UK consumers.

Mr Justice Peter Smith ordered Cityshore and Walker to make an interim repayment of £200,000 through the FSA, to their victims.

They have also been banned for life from selling land by way of business in the UK.

Earlier this year, as part of the same case, a manager of Cityshore, Ashley Cunningham consented to a similar ban and an order requiring her to pay to the FSA sums received by her for her participation in the business.

Cityshore sold plots of land in Grantham, Lincolnshire, to investors on the promise they would make a significant profit when the land ultimately obtained planning permission and was sold on.

In fact, the land was in an area which meant it was unlikely to gain planning permission.

Cityshore's customers were told by the company's sales staff that they had already applied for planning permission for the land or that they had well-known house-builders lined up to purchase the plots.

In reality, Cityshore had no intention of seeking planning permission or helping purchasers sell their land.

Cityshore was stopped by an initial injunction obtained by the FSA in January 2011 after the firm had made sales of land totaling over £400,000 at a significant profit.

The FSA does not regulate the sale of land but land banking amounts to collective investment, something that requires FSA authorisation. Cityshore was never authorised by the FSA so its land sales were illegal.

Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement said: "Anybody investing in land should always have it independently valued to check its worth.

"If you are ever sold land as an investment, and on the basis that someone else will manage it for you as part of a wider site, you should seek the advice of a firm that is authorised by the FSA."

Since 2008 the FSA has obtained injunctions against eight firms involved in land banking.

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Who pays?

If the firm was not authorised, presumably their customers did not have the protection enjoyed by clients of authorised firms. 1) How come the FSA got involved in arranging refunds to customers? It does that surely only for clients of authorised firms? 2) The FSA involvement obviously incurred significant costs. Were those costs covered by any deductions from monies reclaimed?

Posted by: Green Eyed Monster

15 Dec 2011 | 13:43
Complain about this comment

What are the limits

It is interesting how the FSA are involved in this case, in that it appears to be a fraud. The company was not regulated, so would this not normally be a case for the Police. There is obviously a level of unstated apprehension in the blogs that the FSA is moving in strange circles. It appears to have taken over from the Data Protection agency and the police in a number of cases. There is a real sense of the FSA clawing to itself an awful lot of power. Since it considers itself outside the Rule of Law, and is answerable to nobody in their country, I personally find the process somewhat sinister. A hypothetical question I know, but would the verdict and punishment have been same if the police had handle the prosecution? I'm not convinced that it would. Is this a genuinely healthy development? In what appears to be a clear cut case, there is possibly little harm, but what if the circumstances had been more contentious. I have a nagging doubt about the way in which the FSA, soon to be the FCA, appears to be acquiring power de facto rather than de jure.

Posted by: Glen McKeown

15 Dec 2011 | 17:40
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints