MP David Davis has pressed the Financial Services Authority for an explanation over why it allowed Capita to offer only limited redress to victims of the Arch Cru investment funds scandal.
Davis, a leading Tory MP, is concerned the level of compensation was decided not on grounds of fairness, but on Capita's ability to pay, according to the Daily Mail.
The Arch Cru funds were suspended in 2009 amid allegations of widespread mispricing and that fund manager Arch had invested in inappropriate assets.
As authorised corporate director to the Arch Cru funds, Capita's duty was to safeguard investors' assets and ensure their money was invested according to the rules. Investors argue it failed to carry out those responsibilities effectively.
Banking giants HSBC and BNY Mellon have agreed to contribute to a £54m compensation pot, but Capita is providing the bulk.
In a letter on Friday to FSA chief executive Hector Sants, Davis asked why the regulator agreed limited redress with Capita behind closed doors. The £54m deal means most investors, many of whom invested for only a matter of months, will shoulder losses of at least 30%
According to the Mail, Davis said a letter from Sants to Chancellor George Osborne in August spells out ‘the inability of one of three firms - HSBC, BNY Mellon and Capita - to meet its liabilities to compensate investors as a reason for the cap of £54m'.
Davis asked in his letter to Sants: ‘Did the FSA decide that Capita could not pay over £100m? That appears to be the implication of your letter to the Chancellor.'
On Friday, Davis pledged to step up pressure for full compensation. Separately, an all-party parliamentary group will press Capita to attend a meeting in the New Year.
The FSA last week began a review that could lead to some independent advisers being forced to compensate investors.
| Share | |
| Comment | MP David Davis demands answers from FSA on Arch Cru |
More investment news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Out of business
So why pray are Capita still trading. If they genuinely couldn't meet this cash call then all tehir assets should be sequestered and tehir PI policy (I assumen they have one) called upon to satisfy the rest. Simply, the should ahve gone to the wall just as any IFA would ahve done in teh same boat. Ah thats it they are not in the ame boat; friends in high places
Posted by: David
Lack of integrity at FSA
Well, we all know the FSA directors have their own agenda. What always amazes me is : exactly WHY Sants & Turner are regarded as 'talented people, especially when they are an appalling history of failures behind them. I suspect there are some quite capable people at Canary Wharf who do a good job, but they do not have mates who can help them on the last leg of the ladder to the boardroom. Pity Osborne is also disinterested as such incompetence needs to be dealt with using redundancy
Posted by: Graham
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Rob Burdett, co-head of Thames River Multi-Capital, highlights some of the challenges facing...
Viewpoints
The darkest days of the recession following the financial crisis in late 2008 may be behind...
FSA conspires in cover up?
If a letter from Sants to Chancellor George Osborne in August spells out ‘the inability of one of three firms - HSBC, BNY Mellon and Capita - to meet its liabilities to compensate investors as a reason for the cap of £54m’is accurate then - It can only be Capita because the other 2 parties' sums were trivial AND - the FSA didn’t know and so yet again was asleep on the job (Equitable, RBS, KeyData, Arch and now this to add to an interminable list of incompetence) OR the FSA knew and has conspired in the to cover up One wonders when anyone will call Sants and his cronies to account.
Posted by: andrew duggan