MPs label taxman biased to big business in 'systemic failure' of duty

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 20 Dec 2011 | 08:04

Categories: Better Business

Topics: Tax| HMRC| Goldman Sachs| Parliament

dave-hartnett-1

The Public Accounts Committee has issued a damning report on the relationship between Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and big business.

It comes after allegations of a "sweetheart deal" between the Revenue and Goldman Sachs over its alleged £10m unpaid tax bill, the disclosure of which has led to a whistleblower being disciplined.

Margaret Hodge, chair of the accounts committee, said there is a "far too cosy relationship between HMRC and large companies". The report said big businesses are given preferential treatment over individuals and small firms.

MPs said it was "completely unacceptable" that HMRC officials negotiated and approved settlements with big businesses unaccountably.

They also claimed governance arrangements at HMRC were bypassed or overlooked, resulting in one case where £8m in interest on unpaid tax bill was lost to the Exchequer.

MPs said when mistakes were made there was little evidence of personal accountability.

Margaret Hodge, chair of the committee, said the report uncovered "both specific and systemic failures" at HMRC.

Hodge accused top HMRC staff of deliberately withholding information from Parliament in an attempt to cover up backroom deals.

"It is extremely disappointing that senior HMRC officials were not prepared to cooperate with our inquiry," she said.

"We accept there is a need for confidentiality to protect individual taxpayers, but this must not be used as a cloak to protect the department from scrutiny."

The report looked closely at two major cases which it said have been in the public domain but did not specify which companies they concerned.

However, the report did refer to HMRC's permanent secretary for tax Dave Harnett, pictured, and his handling of the Goldman Sachs dispute.

The report said Harnett's evidence to the Treasury Select Committee (TSC) about the Goldman dispute was "imprecise, inconsistent and potentially misleading" and said his relationship with Goldman Sachs is "less than clear".

The committee recommended HMRC separates the negotiation and authorisation of tax settlements and improve accountability of the department to Parliament.

HMRC has appointed two new commissioners, and plans to introduce a new assessor to independently review large settlements before they are approved.

However HMRC has rejected the committee's view that it is suffering from systemic failure.

An HMRC spokesperson said: "HMRC rejects the conclusion that there are systemic failures in the management of tax disputes. The report is based on partial information, inaccurate opinion and some misunderstanding of facts.

"HMRC's internal processes are robust and this was confirmed by a recent review by the National Audit Office of large business settlements."

 

More better business news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Breath taking naiveté

Doesn’t anyone deal with or talk to accountancy practices? If they did none of this would be a surprise. Of course the taxman is cosy with the big firms. It has always been the case. Hasn’t anyone noticed that many tax specialists in accountants’ offices – from the small to the gigantic – are invariably ex-HMRC? Whatever grade you have been on it is guaranteed that when you change from gamekeeper to poacher you will boost your income significantly. The Inland Revenue is in many cases nothing more than a college for accountancy tax specialists. Those that remain are (in the main) pretty sub-standard – witness all the complaints and horror stories.

Posted by: Harry Katz

20 Dec 2011 | 09:04
Complain about this comment

Big Business Tax Bias

Yes Harry Katz. Like MPs expenses fiddles, banks bond flogging practices and PPI mis-selling everyone knows what has been going on but that does not justify it. It is about time this has been looked into and something done to limit or stop it and make HMRC have to openly explain what it has agreed with these big companies and why. HMRC and it's employees should not be able to hide behind so called client confidentiality. The best disinfectant for these practices is full and open disclosure. Also some type of time limit should be put on the so called top tax experts at HMRC before they can leave to work for accountancy firms or large companies and then commence dealing with their old colleagues at HMRC. I believe there have been cases of individuals agreeing very favourable tax deals with large companies then very soon after leaving to join the accountancy firm involved or the company concerned making it look like a quid pro quo. It is just as important to ensure large companies and the very wealthy pay their share of taxation as it is to reduce benefit fraud then maybe the rest of us will not have to pay so much tax.

Posted by: John Smyth

20 Dec 2011 | 12:08
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints