Categories: Investment| RDR
Topics: FSA| TLPI| adviser firms
A blanket ban on traded life policy (TLP) investments would amount to “overkill” and could hamper the UK’s ability to compete in global markets, according to SL Investment Management (SL).
Responding to an FSA consultation on TLP investing, SL said the regulator's concerns would be better addressed by producing guidelines.
In November, the FSA described TLPs as "high risk" and said they were generally unsuitable for most UK retail investors.
But SL said the FSA's concerns apply to only a small number of providers and any future ban would therefore amount to "overkill".
A blanket ban should only be used as a "last resort", it added.
SL argued advisers should be permitted to consider TLPs for clients, pointing out a central tenet of the RDR is the promotion of choice for consumers.
"We consider a blanket ban should only be used as a last resort where other regulatory processes and controls are unable to adequately control the risks," said SL investment director and former chair of the European Life Settlements Association, Patrick McAdams.
Earlier this month, EEA Fund Management urged the FSA to retract its reference to TLPs as "toxic", saying the regulator's statement was "without merit and reckless".
| Share | |
| Comment | FSA ban on death bonds 'would be overkill' |
More investment news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Overkill?
I would probably be the first to say that UK regulation is 'overkill' after the event, or events, but in this case they may be correct in their assumptions.
Posted by: Exasperated Me
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Rob Burdett, co-head of Thames River Multi-Capital, highlights some of the challenges facing...
Viewpoints
The darkest days of the recession following the financial crisis in late 2008 may be behind...
Left hand, or right hand; who is in charge?
Amazing; unbeleivable!Check the last fund bulletin for the Arch Cru Finance fund issued March 2009 a week before suspension. It is listed as a regulated non-UCIS investment approved by the FSA and you will see it holds 5.3% 'life assets' How can this be approved/allowed in a non UCIS fund? More intriguing is the value. This equates to approximately £2.8m of the FV at that date. Is the FSA approving life settlements by the back door there? OR is this the 'missing' Arch/cru soft loan money? The fund bulletin is accessible on the www.archinvestor website run by Clarke Marketing, together with all the other funds.
Posted by: man in blue