FSA successor to protect 'irrational' investors

Author: Investment Week
IFAonline | 25 Jan 2012 | 08:20

Categories: Regulation| Regulation| TCF| Regulation| TCF

Topics: FSA| Financial Conduct Authority| PPI

martin-wheatley-sfc

Investors cannot be counted on to make rational choices so regulators need to "step into their footprints" and limit or ban the sale of potentially harmful products, the head of the UK's new consumer protection watchdog said.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Martin Wheatley, who will head up the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), said the 2008 financial crisis had fundamentally reshaped regulators' assumptions about consumers.

"You have to assume that you don't have rational consumers. Faced with complex decisions or too much information, they default ... They hide behind credit rating agencies or behind the promises that are given to them by the salesperson," said Wheatley.

He said rather than simply ensuring consumers are provided with complete and accurate information, the FCA will be monitoring firms to make sure the right products get sold to the right consumers.

"This much more interventionist style in many respects [means] stepping into the footprints of the investors," he told the Financial Times.

For example, the recent £6bn payment protection insurance debacle might have been prevented if the FSA had had the power to tell banks to stop offering the product, Wheatley said.

But he added such bans would be "relatively rare ... Interventions should be the last tool you grab when all others have failed."

Instead, FCA supervisors would push firms to improve the way they designed and sold products.

"The profitability to the firm appears to be a bigger concern than the suitability to the customer," Wheatley said.

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

irrational investors.

Once again the FSA and its successors want to chuck the baby out with the bathwater. As those people who have claimed on their MPPI and been paid out will confirm it was probably a lifesaver to them. The issue was that some people should never have been sold it because they were not eligible. With MPPI we are in the same situations as endowments,clients have selected memories. I have declined to deal with prospective clients who have told me that they knew they had MPPI but have claimed they did not to get a few bob back.If they would do that, then I would leave myself exposed to selective memory syndrome. Lets start to get real over these issues

Posted by: terry

25 Jan 2012 | 10:18
Complain about this comment

Social Workers

So now we will have to pay for a Regulator that wishes to protect the irrational. What about the schizophrenic and the psychotic – is it fair to leave them out and what about those with acne and dandruff?

Posted by: Harry Katz

25 Jan 2012 | 10:37
Complain about this comment

Is this man for real?

I thought we won the cold? Voters cannot be counted on to make rational choices so the political elite need to "step into their footprints" and limit or ban the voting for potentially harmful political parties, the head of the UK's new TYhought Police said.

Posted by: Nameless

08 May 2012 | 11:32
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints