Categories: Regulation| Regulation
Topics: FSA| risk| PRA (Prudential Regulatory Authority)| Financial Conduct Authority| survey| IFA| consumer
An alarmingly high number of consumers do not know how to risk-rate standard financial products, such as equity ISAs and with-profits bonds, research suggests.
According to a study conducted on behalf of the FSA, 26% of more than 2,064 individuals did not know whether to categorise equity ISAs as low, medium or high risk.
Three in ten did not know how to categorise with-profits bonds, while 16% did not know where to place direct investment in shares.
Meanwhile, 37% of respondents said they believed residential property investment represented little or no risk, while a similar number thought it represented a medium risk venture.
Less than half (45%) said they believed direct investment in shares was high risk.
The Consumer Awareness Survey was conducted by TNS Research International on behalf of the FSA. Its study was of a representative sample of 2,064 adults from across Great Britain interviewed face-to-face in their own home.
The FSA said it was important to conduct the research - as it has done annually since 2003 - ahead of its split into the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), who will be able to measure their success against its findings.
60% are confident that the FSA effectively regulates the financial services industry, but only 5% are very confident that it does so.
One in three people, overall, thinks that the main responsibility of a financial watchdog should be to ensure that firms treat their customers fairly.
One in eight people surveyed have no financial products.
Overall three in five have no appetite for risk at all on investments, with far fewer - 4% - prepared to take risks to gain higher returns.
Fifty five percent of people surveyed are confident that financial firms treat their customers fairly - but only 4% are very confident, and by contrast 13% are unconfident.
More than one in nine people (11%) surveyed report having a problem with a financial services firm in the previous 12 months.
More than one in six of those surveyed (17%) had received professional financial advice in the preceding 12 months, nearly half of whom from an independent financial adviser (IFA), and two in five from a bank or building society. Three out of five people receiving advice from an IFA were very confident that the advice was appropriate to their circumstances - compared with 33% of those going to banks or building societies.
| Share | |
| Comment | Consumers misjudging product risk levels |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Research
53% of the people being asked about risk ratings owned none of the products - and you're right, I don't think there's any real reason why they should answer this question accurately. We could conceivably be a little more worried about the 37% of people who actually own equity ISAs / PEPs / unit trusts who said they wanted to take no risk with their savings or investments.
Posted by: Gillian Cardy
More Ignorant Central Planning
Bonkers completely bonkers. The 'consumer' aka 'the market' prices risk accurately all the time - that is why there is a consistent risk premium for equities. the individual consumer may not be able to say what this but the collective wisdom of the free market works it out, all the time every day. It is only ignorant chaotic central bureaucracies who are forever iognorant of this pricing.
Posted by: Steven Farrall
Consumers understand risk - never mind
As an IFA its gratifying that the FSA has carried out this survey. Most consumers do not understand which products are low/medium/high risk, bearing in mind that its title might not be of much use. Still once RDR has arrived, and they will have to pay for such knowledge, I'm looking forward to seeing what the figures are in five years on the next survey!
Posted by: John Folkard
Do you want to scream?
For heaven’s sake you bunch of idle, navel gazing jobsworths – that is precisely why people consult IFAs. If they don’t take professional advice then it’s their fault. What next? Are you going to bleat that too many die performing do it yourself brain surgery? Oh – and editor why insert percentages for banks and fractions for IFAs – more than 60% (double the number than banks) are happy with their IFA. Isn’t that better copy?
Posted by: Harry Katz
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Risk Ratings
Statistics; survey results; another cavernous yawn. Why should that be "alarming"? The fact that consumers would not necessarily know the risk rating of certain financial products...before taking any sort of advice. I assume the survey meant "without advice"? It was not clear.
Posted by: Giles Sanger