Categories: Regulation| Regulation
Topics: FSA| Financial Conduct Authority| PRA (Prudential Regulatory Authority)
The Financial Services Authority's judgement-based, twin peaks system must be embraced by the industry and lead to behavioural and cultural changes in both firms and regulators, according to Hector Sants.
The chief executive of the FSA today confirmed the new system, which splits conduct and prudential regulation, will come into effect from 2 April, ahead of a more comprehensive overhaul, which will see the establishment of the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
In a speech to the British Bankers' Association, he said the "new world" of judgement-based regulation needed to be "embraced by us all" and also accepted the FSA had been unclear about its own objectives in the past.
Sants added the changes provided an opportunity to "accelerate the behavioural and cultural change needed in both regulators and firms".
"The essence of a judgement-based approach is a willingness to intervene when the regulator judges the outcomes will, in the future, be at variance to its mandate, even if the firm does not agree," he explained.
"Such proactive intervention needs to be proportionate and justified, but if we are to improve outcomes and meet the expectation of Parliament and society, such judgements will have to be made.
"A pre-requisite of encouraging such judgements is that those making them have clarity of purpose and a clear understanding of the objective against which they will be judged."
Under the new system, two independent groups will cover prudential and conduct supervision among banks, insurers and major investment firms.
However, the majority of firms, including most financial advisers, will only be covered by the conduct supervisors.
The Financial Services Bill, which will legislate on the new regulatory system, is currently making its way through Parliament.
| Share | |
| Comment | Sants urges industry to embrace 'judgement-based' regulation |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
I think Hector must be having a sort of breakdown.
Judgement based?? With the Regulator being the Judge, Jury and Executioner. When the defendant has no route for appeal (reasonable or no cost) or redress. Oh yes old son we are really going to embrace that one! No just make the rules. We’ll adhere and you have no leeway to make things up as you go along.
Posted by: Harry Katz
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Judges???
Who Judges the Judges? Certainly not the Treasury Select Committee. I thought that an elected body of MPs wodld have some infulence to be the (peoples)voice of reason. Not, it appears, with the unreasonable!
Posted by: dwinsal