Hargreaves shares tumble on business growth fears

Author: Nick Paler
IFAonline | 09 Feb 2012 | 09:31

Categories: Economics / Markets

Topics: Hargreaves Lansdown| FTSE 100| ISA| fund platform

ian gorham

Hargreaves Lansdown shares fell sharply in morning trading as investors looked past record profits to focus on slowing business growth.

This morning the group reported record underlying profits of £72m in the second half of 2011, while revenues climbed 16% to £112.9m.

However, total net business inflows fell to £1.16bn, down 13%, and by mid-morning shares were selling-off.

By 8:51am, shares were down 3.3% or 15p, to 445p, making them the top faller on the FTSE 100. Meanwhile the FTSE was up 0.3% to 5,898.5.

Hargreaves' share price has tumbled over the past year, after previously hitting a high of 646.5p before the summer market sell off.

It remains near the low point of 404.4p which it fell to last August, despite a broad recovery seen across most of the market.

Today Ian Gorham, chief executive, was upbeat, noting the group had seen strong inflows in the face of the downturn.

He said: "In spite of unfavourable conditions and lower investment values, we continued to see healthy net business inflow, only marginally down on our record previous year, and we welcomed 16,000 new clients to the Vantage service.

"In addition to delivering record revenues and profits we have improved our competitiveness, reduced charges and improved the functionality of our systems.

"Lower stockbroking fees and ISA management charges were introduced from 1 August 2011, which has led to a rise in our share of the UK stockbroking market during the period.

"We have continued to see flows of business from competitors which is an emphatic confirmation of our strong market position."

More economics / markets news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Not exactly

Gorham: "we have improved our competitiveness, reduced charges" For the majority of their clients they *increased* their fees on January 1 by imposing new charges on all funds that paid them lower rates of trail commission. It's the way they did that, including not providing a full list of affected funds and giving just 4 weeks notice, that caused clients to question their integrity and will leave investors in their shares questioning their management competence. If they were unable to do that right, will they manage the completing restructure of pricing required by RDR any better?

Posted by: PeterD

25 Feb 2012 | 14:33
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints