Lawyer: FOS drifting closer to regulation

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 08 Mar 2012 | 23:15

Categories: Regulation| Regulation| Regulation

Topics: Financial Ombudsman Service| Financial Conduct Authority| FSA| Reynolds Porter Chamberlain

foslogo

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) will drift closer to becoming a regulator under a proposed memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), according to a legal expert.

The draft MoU was issued last month, building on the existing MoU between the FOS and the financial services industry.

Although the new agreement is largely similar to the previous MoU, Robbie Constance, a partner at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, said there were subtle differences which could change the relationship between the organisations.

One new clause he pointed to appears to put more onus on the Ombudsman to share information with the FCA, saying it "must disclose information" if it thinks this "might be of assistance to the FCA in advancing one or more of the FCA's operational objectives".

Constance said: "I think it does increase the obligation on the Ombudsman to report and sees it becoming more of a wing of the regulator."

Another important difference between the two documents, according to Constance, is with the wording of a clause which allows the regulator to request specific information about cases from the Ombudsman.

The 2007 MoU says that if requested by the FSA to provide information about "actual or contemplated regulatory action", FOS has agreed to provide "the number and types of complaints handled; and specific initial and final decisions".

In contrast, the draft MoU says the FOS "may give the FCA (for the specific firm concerned) information that is relevant to the discharge of the FCA's statutory functions."

Beyond the new MoU, Constance has also pointed to the plans to publish Ombudsman decisions as another concern, warning it could empower claims management companies and convince businesses to settle a claim unnecessarily.

"There will no doubt be claims management companies seeking to embarrass firms into a settlement," he said.

"Even if the Ombudsman upholds the adjudicator decision, the fact that the decision is published could prove to be embarrassing to firms."

More regulation news

Related briefings

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

  • Comments
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Share
blog comments powered by Disqus

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2012

View all the winners here

This year we celebrate the fifth annual PPR Structured Product Awards. The 13 awards are divided into two, covering the products delivered to market over the past year and the support services that are also essential to the market. All the awards are designed to highlight not just the winners but the strengths and capabilities of the range of providers in this highly innovative market.

Events

event logo

Cover Group Risk Breakfast Briefing 2013

21 May 2013 - 21 May 2013

London, UK

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2013

14 Jun 2013 - 14 Jun 2013

London, UK

event logo

The British Mortgage Awards 2013

04 Jul 2013 - 04 Jul 2013

London, UK

Markets

Sponsored video

Poll

Is Hector Sants right to think his tenure as FSA chief executive was a success?