SFO drops Madoff UK case over lack of evidence

International Investment | 02 Feb 2010 | 12:45

Categories: Investment

Topics: fraud

bernard-madoff-2009

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) says it has insufficient evidence to press charges against Bernie Madoff's London-based company or its directors.

It says it would be unable to obtain a realistic prospect of conviction against Madoff Securities International Ltd.

This is despite the London unit, which was officially placed into liquidation in January, being owned almost exclusively by Bernie Madoff himself. It functioned as his proprietary trading unit and his personal piggy bank, according to investigators.

It listed assets of $500m and debt of more than $1bn, when it filed for bankruptcy in Florida last year.

In its charges against Madoff, the US government claimed he used the UK arm to launder client money by transferring it from the investment-advisory business in New York to London and back to the US.

Investigators believe the transatlantic money route was to create the illusion of legitimacy, with money flowing into the US giving the impression London was a profit centre.

In 2008 alone, £698m was transferred to the UK business' principal bank account from Madoff's US trading operations. In the same year, £1.1bn was transferred back to the US trading arm.

Although the UK operation, unlike its US counterpart, did conduct some legitimate business, trading shares of large-capitalization stocks and currency, it was not particularly profitable. In 2007, for instance, the UK business reported a trading profit of only £7.6m.

Madoff, 71, was sentenced in June to 150 years in prison for running a 20-year Ponzi scheme.

KPMG, which audited Madoff's accounts, is among the parties being sued by investors who lost money in the fraud.

 

More from international investment

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Made Off by Madoff!

Another fine mess you got me into............. For thsoe of you who don't remember Larel & Hardy it was one of those famous phrases that used to be spurted out regularly. Do I see a similarity here? Signed off by Mr Boom and Bust on the behalf of The UK Super Regulator

Posted by: Incompetent Regulators Awards Team

02 Feb 2010 | 16:34
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints