Feature - Inheritance Tax
Categories: Inheritance Tax
Tags:Peter mcgahan| Informed choice| Martin bamford| Offshore bonds
This week Les Scadding and his wife Samantha Peachey-Scadding from Caerleon, South Wales, won £45.5m on the EuroMillions.
This huge, tax-free win means the couple is now as wealthy as many supermodels, footballers and movie stars. Mr Scadding, 58, is an unemployed grandfather of six and cancer survivor. His wife, 38, runs a marketing and PR company from home. What should they do with their newly-found fortune?
Peter McGahan, managing director, Worldwide Financial Planning Limited
The UK government will have helped Les and Samantha with the extra nil rate band for inheritance tax. That will have pulled the total IHT bill down from £18,070,000 to a mere £17,940,000 - what a bonus!
The extra allowance for an ISA will help as Les can now put in £10,200 into an ISA but Samantha will have to suffice with £7,200 as she isn’t aged 50 yet. She can enjoy that pleasure in April 2010 when everyone will benefit from the higher allowance.
An investment into a range of products that impose capital gains tax and offer growth per year of 7%, will after allowances attract £573,300 in tax per year. However, this is still more attractive than the good old investment bond which most people invest into. Unfortunately for Les and Samantha they will be hit for their highest rate of tax on the income on any gain in a bond.
For example, an investment into an onshore investment bond (which is basically a default vehicle for most bank or tied advisers) would enjoy the highest rate of tax on the gain. So they invest at year one and five years later after a return of 7% per year they decide to encash. The gain which is added to their income for the year is £18,316,103.
If plans to tax higher rate tax payers at a mere 50% come into play in April 2010, Les and Samantha will have to part with nearly £9m in tax.
So a few tips to consider: The accountant you used to work out your day-to-day expenses will probably need an upgrade.
Consider an offshore bond with investments but use a fee-based adviser so as to pay for the services in a tax efficient manner. An offshore bond allows for tax free growth on the investment (apart from a small element of withholding tax in certain countries of origin). All the investments inside this tax efficient wrapper can be traded without any liability to capital gains tax.
Les and Samantha could disappear for a year and become non resident for a year and then encash the bond outside of the UK's tax regime. They should make whatever gifts they can now to mitigate inheritance tax, use a qualified investment specialist rather than a generalist and ask for lots of opinions on their ability.
And….whilst I am sure they will not let it affect their lives, they will probably, for tax reasons, knock the overtime on the head.
Martin Bamford, managing director, Informed Choice
This is clearly a life changing event for Les and Samantha. I have no doubt that they will be on the receiving end of plenty of well meaning advice from family, friends, professional advisers touting their services and, sadly, a few crooks as well. It is important that they take things slowly, don’t rush into any major decisions and ensure they are doing things for the right reason, rather than to line the pockets of others.
We all have different objectives in life. Suddenly winning a massive amount of money should not fundamentally change these objectives although it does open up a whole new world of possibilities. They should do their best to live the rest of their lives in line with their own values rather than how they believe the wealthy live.
We tend to see only one version of the super wealthy in the public eye; those with flashy lifestyles – driving expensive cars, living in massive properties and spending a disproportionate amount of time on foreign holidays. In reality, most rich people live quiet and unassuming lifestyles. If lottery winners believe all of the hype about what being rich involves, they will quickly fritter away even this substantial amount of cash.
A good plan of action would be to work with a professional qualified financial planner on a fixed project fee basis, so there is no motivation for the adviser to recommend a commission paying investment solution. Paying a fixed fee will ensure there is no potential for bias with the advice. The lottery organisers will want to parachute in their own financial adviser, but these winners are at liberty to shop around and find an adviser better suited to their own needs.
Suddenly being on the receiving end of a substantial amount of money can place a great deal of strain on even the most secure relationships. As well as their own marriage, they will need to pay particular attention to the relationships they have with their family. It would make sense to establish firm ground rules now in terms of the money, how it will be used during their lifetime and what any future inheritance might look like.
For any future lottery winners, possibly the best advice would be to keep their identity secret. Going public on a big win can bring with it unwanted attention and problems. Confidentiality can give lottery winners some much needed breathing space and allow them to make important decisions in their own time.
Categories: Inheritance Tax
Tags: Peter mcgahan| Informed choice| Martin bamford| Offshore bonds
Comments
Related articles
Audio/Video
Related Media
In Focus
Traditionally, the purpose of a bank account within a pension scheme has been rather one dimensional.
Viewpoints
The mortgage market appears, perhaps more gently than we’d like, to be starting to display some of those green shoots of recovery.
Euro lottery winners
Why on earth would you stay in the UK and bother with making these petty amounts?
Posted by: James Town