‘My house is my pension’: How to dispel the property myth

Author: Rachel Dalton
Professional Adviser | 13 Oct 2011 | 08:00

Categories: Pensions - Retail| Property Investment

Topics: ISA| LV=

barcode-house

Property is no longer the nest egg some imagine, and your clients need to know...

The baby boomer generation, having made big returns on property in the 1980s, is well versed in the virtues of property investing.

However, it can be hard to illustrate to them that although the value of their house has grown considerably, it is unlikely there is enough money in their property to keep them in old age.

After the house price crash of 2008, it is even more important to dispel the property myth than ever.

Three advisers gave us their best tips on how to wake clients up from their property daydreams.

Delusional

Jason Witcombe, director of Evolve Financial Planning, said some people’s faith in the robust value of their house borders on delusional.

“People always think their property is immune to market crashes,” he said.
“Imagine if there were signs on houses that displayed their value every second of every day, like a stock market. People would not get out of bed in the morning.”

However, Witcombe said it is important not to push clients averse to saving straight towards pensions, particularly if they are basic-rate taxpayers.

“First I tell clients nobody needs a pension to have a secure retirement; you can do it with ISAs or savings accounts. You allay their fears of locking away money until they are 55,” he said.

“Then you help them balance their accessible money and their committed money to suit their needs.”

Liquid wealth

Pete Matthew, director, Jacksons Financial Planning, said clients are often blinded by the thousands of pounds their house is worth, and do not realise how little retirement income this translates to.

“I get clients to imagine a bucket, and inside is their liquid wealth, so the things which cannot go in the bucket are their house, their pension and their business,” he said.

“It shows you have to sell your house to get income, or remortgage or release equity.

“Simple cashflow modelling helps because clients cannot project how much income they need or can get for retirement.”

Diversify

Sam Caunt, company secretary, Kingston IFA, said he tells clients property investing can be rewarding, but it is also volatile and they must diversify if they are counting on property to pay for even some of their retirement needs.

“What if the local council diverts a bypass to the back of your house and the value falls? Or you could be in green belt country and some travellers arrive,” he said.

 

How many people are banking on their homes?

Research from LV=

  • 31% of over-50s plan to use equity in their home as retirement income – 500,000 more than in 2010.
  • 35% think the value of their home has fallen in the last three years by an average of £24,651.
  • 13% said they will take advice on releasing the equity from their property for retirement.

 

More from professional adviser

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

The Housing Snake

Totally agree, this is a major barrier to balanced financial planning. Two expressions reveal the depth of the problem - the "housing ladder" and "as safe as houses". No matter the short, mid or long term future of house prices people still talk of the "ladder". But it might also be a housing snake"... And investors cannot expect double digit annual gains from a "safe" investment.

Posted by: Brendan Llewellyn

18 Oct 2011 | 13:54
Complain about this comment

Home Ownership Delusion

The home ownership delusion situation is IMO even worse than depicted here. The UK and devolved Governments are pouring public funding into encouraging low and moderate income households into owner-occupation – a sector which is unsuitable and almost certainly unsustainable for them. Research this year from the Resolution Foundation, TUC, JRF and SHELTER etc. have all demonstrated how risky (and deteriorating) owner-occupation is for such hosueholds. Even the right-wing Adam Smith Institute has called for a ‘wake-up call’ to British politicians on the delusions of mass owner-occupation extending to those on low to middle incomes. In Scotland some time ago, we heard Scottish Government Communities and Housing Minister Housing Alex Neil stating that it was a duty [repeat duty] of Scottish Government to help people on moderate incomes who want to enter ‘home ownership’ (it could also be sensibly regarded not as true ownership, but as heavily mortgaged indebtedness). The current Scottish Housing Minister, in speaking about “those on low to moderate incomes”, proclaims that "The Scottish Government has already ploughed millions into a variety of shared equity schemes to help people get onto the property ladder…” Doubtless the Conservative Coalition Government Ministers would echo those sentiments, but I don’t accept nor understand them. Why and when did it become a duty for UK Governments to assist vulnerable households to enter the housing market – especially the unsustainable, unstable and dysfunctional UK housing market? I laid out much of the case against unsustainable owner-occupation in my recent feature in Renegade Economist at: http://www.renegadeeconomist.com/news/the-dirty-big-secret-of-the-home-ownership-delusion.html

Posted by: Edward Harkins

18 Oct 2011 | 18:41
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints