FSA ignoring lack of transparency in client charges - Novia

Author: Charlotte Banks
Professional Adviser | 03 Jul 2009 | 11:00

Categories: Better Business| Wrap/platforms

Topics: FSA| RDR| | Bill Vasilieff

ifa-big-jpg

Wrap provider Novia says the FSA failed to pick up on the lack of transparency in client charges in the platform sector in its recent Consultation Paper.

Chief executive officer Bill Vasilieff says whilst the push of the RDR towards clear product pricing and adviser remuneration has been acknowledged, lack of transparency has not been.

“There are still too many examples of undisclosed rebates from fund managers to advisers that could be viewed as influencing platform choice for their clients, for example the illusion that platforms are ‘free’ to the client.

“We know the FSA have promised a Thematic Review of platforms and we will be making our thoughts known,” he adds.

However, Novia says it is ideally placed to serve those advisers choosing the independent route post RDR.

 “There is a considerable fit with the proposition we have for professional investment advisers and their clients. We are offering the breadth of asset choice including ETFs and structured products that have been highlighted in the latest RDR proposals – for example we have around 600 ETFs available now,” says Vasilieff.

“We also believe it is right clients agree to the fees appropriate to the work and value their advisers add – we support Adviser Charging flexibility on our wrap platform.  Flexibility itself raises an issue - for some players there will be considerable system changes and high redevelopment costs.”

More from professional adviser

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Hidden charges

Couldn't agree more. Not to mention the seldom discussed charge represented by dismal interest rates on cash or the very hidden 'charge' implied by a constrained fund range.

Posted by: David Ferguson

03 Jul 2009 | 12:38
Complain about this comment

Transparency

Presumably the use of mirror funds providing rebates to platforms such as Standard Life will have to be declared under the new rules. Also one hopes that the the current factoring arrangements will go thus ending the mockery of the independence tag by many adviser firms. One day we just might throw away the dictionary and just tell it as it is thus giving an honest transparent picture of what is actually going on in the industry as far as remuneration is concerned.

Posted by: phil melville

03 Jul 2009 | 15:02
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints