RDR fund volatility warning

Author: Hysni Kaso
Professional Adviser | 29 Jul 2010 | 08:00

Categories: Investment

Topics: multi-asset| Cofunds| Schroders| Investec| Cazenove

rob-thorpe-formal

Fund groups have warned the RDR will lead to increased volatility in fund flows and a greater share of assets going to a handful of the larger asset managers.

According to the IMA's annual fund management survey, a number of groups believe the impact of the RDR - which is likely to increase platform-based distribution and accelerate the use of guided architecture models - will have "profound consequences" for fund flows.

Groups say the increasing use of asset allocators making investment decisions on behalf of advisers could lead to millions of pounds entering or leaving funds at any one time.

One respondent says the RDR-led shift towards investment outsourcing will unquestionably increase the volatility and velocity of assets.

"It is quite interesting that in a market that is quite idiosyncratic, where thousands of people guided by thousands of IFAs make thousands of decisions, the environment is quite stable," the respondent says.

"When you move to consolidate onto platforms and single asset allocation decisions affecting large amounts of assets, you get everybody in and everybody out at the same time.

"Under RDR, small IFAs will think: ‘I am just an ordinary IFA and not a wealth manager good at constructing portfolios, I think I will hand over to someone else to do the selection and risk profiles.'

"Everyone is going to end up buying and selling China at the same time. RDR is going to move people into an asset allocation environment and the market will get much more volatile."

Guided architecture and investment outsourcing solutions are increasingly coming to market, well ahead of the implementation of the RDR.

The Cofunds platform last year launched its OBSR guided architecture service, while Cazenove linked with Towergate Financial earlier this year to offer model portfolio solutions.

Another survey respondent says the idea of open architecture is "dying quickly".

"Open architecture platforms deliver too much choice for consumers and create too much risk for platform providers. Going forward, we will be moving into a more guided architecture world. This might mean better margins for firms which can get their product onto somebody's guided architecture platform."

Schroders managing director of UK retail Robin Stoakley says the increasing use of guided architecture and asset allocation models is already well underway and will have an impact on traditional fund distribution.

"If you look at the professional fund selectors, the fund of fund managers for example, they gravitate towards similar funds and broadly agree on asset allocation," he says.

"They are broadly likeminded and are more active in asset allocation shifts than the adviser community."

With fund groups increasingly looking to access the guided architecture market, Stoakley warns smaller groups could struggle.

"Like anything it is about absolute performance and risk adjusted returns. But it is also about service and access to fund managers and the strength in depth of the group.

"While we see this as a big opportunity, it is definitely an issue for the smaller groups which have not got this strength in depth."

However, Cazenove head of UK advisory sales Rob Thorpe says the shift to guided architecture has already arrived.

"Guided architecture and outsourcing is already here. Look at the increased use of multi-manager and portfolio toolsets on the platforms - it already exists," he says.

"We have our retail fund business and the discretionary fund business and from our experiences we have not seen any differences with the flow dynamic from the different markets.

"These solutions will increase in importance in the lead-up to and after the implementation of the RDR, but it is too early to tell whether it will lead to a revolution of how we do business."

 

More from professional adviser

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Don't be silly.

I think they are a bit blind to what is happening in the industry. Poor returns, high costs, bad service and endless paper work mean advisers are now shifting to index replication for a lot of clients and managing the asset allocation via Platforms. The active managed industry is generally rather poor and expensive, the good managers will have nothing to fear.

Posted by: Tumble Dryer

29 Jul 2010 | 15:35
Complain about this comment

More professional investing

Re volatility of fund flows what I think the the fund groups meant to say was that as more clients portfolios are invested via 24/7 investment services that those assets will be invested in a more professional way. As a result investments in underperforming funds/sectors will be moved to funds/sectors that might be about to perform quicker. Maybe the client outcome will be better? Re dash for brand, this has been happening for a while and it will take more favourable economic and market prospects to change this. When they do turn than the smaller nimbler fund manager will have their time again.

Posted by: Angus Duncan

29 Jul 2010 | 15:50
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints