FSA warns firms over unqualified advisers’ roles post-2012

Author: Rachel Dalton
Professional Adviser | 13 May 2011 | 10:00

Categories: RDR

Topics: FSA| RDR

steve-patterson
Steve Patterson

Firms offering non-advisory roles to IFAs who fail to meet RDR requirements are being warned by the FSA to make sure they do not stray into delivering advice.

A number of firms are considering offering paid introducer roles to unqualified advisers or retirees after 2012 as they pass their clients on to a new, qualified practitioner.

These ‘lay advocates’ may sit in on meetings and be a point of contact for their old clients, but they will not be permitted to give financial advice.

Firms had sought guidance from the FSA about how the regulator would view this arrangement and admitted to concerns about unauthorised individuals “accidentally” advising clients.

The FSA hinted it would be firms’ responsibility to ensure lay advocates do not make recommendations to their old clients.

A spokesperson said: “The risk of former advisers who remain in contact with their clients giving unregulated advice depends on how the firm manages that risk.

"Any ex-IFA employed in this capacity, regardless of the job title attached, will have to be careful not to stray into advice.”

The FSA said it was not necessary to issue any further guidance on lay advocate adding: “The situation is very clear: Any adviser giving advice after 1 January 2013 must be fully qualified.”

Bristol-based Sovereign IFA and Glasgow adviser Intelligent Pensions are two firms planning to offer lay advocate roles to former IFAs after 2012.

Steve Patterson, managing director of Intelligent Pensions, said his firm intends to offer the role to advisers at the firms it acquires.

He said these IFAs will work as ‘investment agents’ for their old clients as they are gradually introduced to their new Intelligent Pensions adviser.

James Marchant, an adviser with Sovereign IFA, said his firm has acquired a sole trader business and offered the partner a non-authorised advocate role to “ensure a smooth handover of clients”.

Marchant said the firm will be selective to counter the potential risk of advisers straying into advice whilst speaking to clients.

“The non-authorised individual assists with fact finding and administrative tasks, nothing more,” he said. “The plus point is that the presence of said adviser should help to secure the relationship going forward.”

Firms say they will pay lay advocates in a number of ways: as a percentage of client fees, as a salary or as a fixed retainer.

 

More from professional adviser

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

So I was right

It is simply the responsibility of the directly regulated firm to ensure their staff have both the requisite qualificaitons AND the requisite authorisation. A non level 4 person cannot advise, NOR can a person qualified to level 4, i.e. a paraplanner unless they are authorised and appear on the FSA register. I quote from the article - "non-advisory roles to IFAs who fail to meet RDR requirements are being warned by the FSA to make sure they do not stray into delivering advice" No avoiding costs by letting unauthorised, but qualified paraplanners accidentally advise either. Using paraplanners to keep costs down is very wise, but the sign off verbal and written needs to be from the authorised person, it cannot come via qualification alone, especially if complaints are to be logged against individuals rather than firms alone from 2013.

Posted by: Phil Castle

13 May 2011 | 10:29
Complain about this comment

Financial Advice Coalition Style

I envisage there will be a very short honeymoon period before the ex IFA gets hacked off by the new IFA's advice and drags "his" client bank off to another qualified adviser. Eventually, the client will become dissastisfied and seek a new home entirley. This is a disaster waiting to happen.

Posted by: Rob

13 May 2011 | 11:27
Complain about this comment

So, I met this bloke down the pub, and he said...

Bonkers. Utterly bonkers. It afils to amaze me how a bunch of ignorant functionaries ever come up with this guff? All that'll happen is that the advsiers robbed of their livlihood and businesses by the arbitrary actions of a unaccountable authoritarian functionaries i.e. the FSA, will meet theior erstwhile clients down the pub or whereve and continue to provide the advice, and the suggest that they go an see xyz ltd if the want or need a product. xyz ltd can legitimately make payaways for 'marketing' to the deprived adviser and no-one can say or prove anything different. Unless the FSA propses to bug the whole nation.

Posted by: Steven Farrall

16 May 2011 | 17:00
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints