Advisers warn of portal pricing threat to whole of market advice

Author: Laura Miller
Professional Adviser | 26 May 2011 | 08:00

Categories: Better Business

Topics: Assureweb| Avelo| AT8

loosmore-mark

Advisers have warned their whole of market status could be threatened by the number of different ‘best quotes’ on offer from financial research portals.

The Money Advice Service (MAS), Assureweb and Avelo Exchange claim to offer a quicker alternative to calling life companies direct while offering the best available quote on a range of financial products.

But some advisers comparing quotes across the three tools found they returned different ‘best’ quotes for the same client, as providers were knocked off some results lists despite offering the top deal on others.

Mark Loosmore, from IT consultancy AT8, said: “There shouldn’t be this inconsistency. Post-RDR this may come down to a discussion about what whole of market really means.”

IFAs who realised the discrepancy said they have felt obliged to run all three tools to ensure they offer a genuine whole of market option to clients, which could treble their workload.

Alistair Cunningham, principal at Wingate Financial, said for one client couple seeking a standard annuity, only two out of the three tools returned the same best quote.

“With a standard annuity there is one specific best option for the client, but using only one tool I may not have known the best deal to follow up. The total lack of consistency is tripling my workload.”

MAS said Avelo Exchange provides the data for its annuity tables. But IFAonline has seen documents showing the two portals returned different quotes for the same couple.

Dave Miller, head of provider relationships at Avelo Exchange, said quotes can vary from firm to firm based on providers’ terms with individual adviser firms.

“The MAS annuity comparison tool uses Avelo Exchange’s back office system, which will return quotes based on providers’ default quote setting for that product. For advisers who go directly through Avelo, providers return quotes based on the specific terms they have agreed with the adviser firm.

“Larger firms may have been able to agree special terms. So the quotes may vary.”
On its website, the MAS states better rates may be available as some providers offer higher “loyalty” rates to their existing clients. It does not show these rates in the table but points out which providers offer them.

A spokesperson added: “At the start of the process we ask the customer key questions, to provide illustrative rates, not actual quotes.”

Variances could also be created by the depths of questions fed into the quote engines, which could exclude some quotes, Loosmore said.

The MAS comparison tool asks the fewest and least detailed questions, with no technical element, while Assureweb is more detailed and Avelo Exchange is the most in-depth.

“It could be more dangerous to compare quotes across three tools which ask for different data,” Loosmore said.

To add to the confusion, not all providers give quotes on each of the portals. Aegon, Standard Life, Scottish Widows, Axa and Friends Life have chosen not to supply quotes on the MAS, which only lists rates for the “most popular annuities”.

Loosmore recommended advisers choose one tool to deliver consistent results across all clients, and to couple it with robust individual due diligence.

Ian Teague, commercial director at Assureweb, said the portal is striving to make services as accurate as possible.

“We understand the need for advisers to get the most accurate information possible in the first instance,” he said.

More from professional adviser

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

No news here

Sounds like the Exchange is the best option then, which we already knew.

Posted by: James

26 May 2011 | 14:12
Complain about this comment

Comprehensive does not mean best!

Avelo Exchange may be the most comprehensive, but how can it be the best, if it doesn't always give the best rate? Best means to use all tools at your disposal AND to ring around relevant providers to see if the rate they offer is realistic. James, your attitude is a classic example of doing 'just enough', when frankly clients may be better served by more thorough research.

Posted by: Alistair Cunningham

26 May 2011 | 16:31
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints