risk clinic

Risk Clinic: Over-insured, under-employed

Cover | 14 Feb 2012 | 15:15

My 45-year-old client was made redundant due to the recession, but has recently started a new yet much lower-paid job. With his income protection (IP) policy covering his last wage level, he is now over-insured and would not be able to claim his full benefit sum. He has affordability problems with life and critical illness (CI) and we will probably have to downgrade him. What should I consider?

matt-rann

Risk Clinic - PMI moratorium underwriting

I do few PMI sales and want to cover my back with a business client. They are a wealthy couple in their 50s and both have had heart attacks. Obviously their PMI cost is high but they are looking at moratorium underwriting to alleviate this. Am I right to be concerned, even though I’ve explained it to them?

Cover | 20 Jan 2012 | 14:51
Alan Lakey

Risk Clinic: Lump sum vs severity-based CI

My client has been reading about severity based payments for critical illness (CI) policies. I believe there is merit in polices that don’t do this. In sales terms, what is the opposite side of the argument I can put to him?

Cover | 06 Dec 2011 | 14:49

Other risk clinic articles

image-of-father-and-son-using-laptop

Risk clinic: Newly redundant single parents

My client is just starting out in freelance consultancy after being made redundant. He is a single parent with a 14-year-old daughter and previously had all major protections and private medical insurance (PMI) through work. I will cover him for the usual needs, but are there any wrinkles I should be aware of?

Cover | 07 Nov 2011 | 15:10
business-queue

Risk clinic: How to deal with staff absenteeism

During a recent visit to a small company, my client was complaining about the length and frequency of her staff absence. Having no experience in this before, where would my start point be in introducing an absence management and return to work policy

Cover | 17 Oct 2011 | 10:00
image-of-father-and-son-using-laptop

Risk Clinic: FIB on critical illness

I have a client making a claim on a critical illness (CI) policy. The provider is suggesting they take a lump sum payment rather than the family income benefit (FIB) they originally bought. I realise there are various arguments for each side, but what would be the one that swings it toward FIB?

Cover | 12 Sep 2011 | 15:22
drugs2

Risk Clinic: Addiction

My client is a 48-year-old successful businessman with a wife and two children. He was a cocaine addict but has been through rehab three times and is currently clean. He also smokes. Having no protection at the moment, he is aware of the need to look after his wife and children. What are his options?

Cover | 11 Aug 2011 | 16:19
retired-couple

Risk Clinic: PMI for scheme retirees

I advise on PMI schemes for small groups. With many members in their 60s, what do I need to consider as they approach retirement?

Cover | 08 Jul 2011 | 14:25
Taylor Wimpey houses

Risk Clinic: MPPI and PPI concerns

Several clients have come to me with queries about existing mortgage payment protection insurance (MPPI) and PPI policies. I don’t have the time to read all the policy documentation, but given the current situation in the PPI market for Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) and compliance reasons, should I look into re-broking them into standard products?

Cover | 08 Jun 2011 | 15:11
Mixing desk

Risk Clinic: Life and CI enhancements

I treat life and critical illness as fairly commoditised products for perfectly healthy people aged under 35. Can I do more to help them in this area?

Cover | 13 May 2011 | 14:35
question mark

Risk Clinic: Protecting those with pre-existing conditions

I have a client who has many health problems, but recognises the significant need for protection. Due to his Crohn’s disease, type 1 diabetes and heart condition, I have found it impossible to get cover from any of the major providers. Cost is not an issue, but what other options do I have?

Cover | 13 Apr 2011 | 14:30
happy-workers

Risk Clinic: Group IP vs individual IP

My client has an individual IP policy, but his employer is offering group IP cheaper for the same level of cover, plus an employee assistance programme (EAP). It is unlikely he will work for the same employer for life and this policy has a continuation of cover option. Should he take out a small level of cover on the group scheme alongside his individual one to access the EAP, transfer all his cover to the cheaper group scheme, or is he better off maintaining his individual policy alone?

Cover | 08 Mar 2011 | 14:30
pete-chadborn

Risk Clinic: Business protection

A client who owns a four-man window fitting company has asked me to organise business protection for him. This is not an area I’m familiar with, so as a complete beginner how do I go about evaluating the amount I should be protecting him for?

Cover | 08 Feb 2011 | 12:26

Viewpoints

In Focus

Latest jobs

Coffee Lounge