Providers respond to BlackRock proposals

Author: Clare Dickinson
ETFM | 07 Oct 2011 | 16:18

Categories: ETFs

Topics: ETF| BlackRock| Source| Russell Investments

A magnifying glass and a book
Providers agree that greater transparency is needed

ETF providers in Europe and the US have responded to BlackRock's call for greater transparency and consistent regulation in the ETF market but opinions are divided.

UK-based ETP provider Source supports BlackRock's stance. Michael John Lytle, managing director at the company says: "Source strongly supports BlackRock's call for codification of the high standards currently being delivered by the ETF community."

He adds that "European investors deserve coherent and consistent diclosure that allows them to compare and contrast different investment products - not just ETFs. For example, not all exchange-traded products operate in the highly controlled Ucits regulatory framework that governs all European exchange traded funds. Providing a framework which clearly distinguishes regulated investment products from others is critical for investor protection."

Source also supports calls for a consolidated tape in the European market, on which all ETF transactions are reported.

However, BlackRock's call is for global standardisation in the ETF market and US ETF provider Russell Investments disagrees that this is needed.

"I would say that in the US market ETFs are more regulated than any mass market financial product that I am aware of and we don't allow many of the structures which are used in Europe," says Mark Roberts, director of research and development for Russell ETFs.

"ETFs [in the US] are generally prohibited from holding any kind of derivative. When somebody says we need more regulation I would be cautious to say that is true in the US." However, he supports BlackRock's call for greater transparency.

Roberts questions how cross-market standards would be possible when each market has its own different characteristics. "Ucits is the closest we have seen globally to a uniform set of regulations across sovereign nations," he says.

"Many markets in Asia will also validate Ucits as an important regulatory construct but they all maintain a sovereign trump card on Ucits. If it is at odds with any local regulation, the local regulation takes precedence. Fund structures are locally regulated entities."

iShares notes that each country has its own nuances and says that it plans to release recommendations specifically for the European market in the next couple of weeks.

 

More from etfm

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints