Standard Life fined £2.45m after Sterling fund debacle

Author: John Bakie
IFAonline | 20 Jan 2010 | 10:44

Categories: Pensions - Retail| Pensions

Topics: FSA| Standard Life

fsa

Standard Life has been fined £2.45m by the FSA for serious failures relating to its Pension Sterling fund.

The FSA says the penalty, the first major fine of 2010, signals its intentions to crack down on regulatory breaches.

The fund became controversial in January 2009, when Standard Life made a shock 5% decrease in its valuation.

Regulators says the firm misled customers, as the product was originally sold as a ‘safe' cash fund, despite being linked to risky mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

The FSA believes systems and controls failings were responsible for the production of the misleading marketing material.

Standard Life also failed to perform a prompt and full investigation of its marketing material when concerns were raised.

The FSA acknowledged Standard Life's pro-active attempts to compensate investors, including paying £102.7m into the fund to restore its original unit price values, and its use of a third party to advice on the necessary changes to its systems and controls.

Margaret Cole, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA, says: "The FSA takes the issue of misleading financial promotions very seriously and the fine announced today demonstrates our commitment to the principle of credible deterrence.

"It is critical that consumers are given an accurate understanding of the nature of investment products and the risks involved. Without this information, consumers are unable to make informed decisions about whether investments are suitable for their individual investment strategy."

A Standard Life spokesman adds: "We have learned important lessons from this mistake and have made significant improvements to our marketing literature processes to prevent the same thing happening again."

The FSA says it will be taking a tough stance on financial promotions and marketing material in 2010.

 

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

A whipping boy?

Yes, it was a mess and Standard probably deserved the fine. BUT they did make great efforts to set things right and to compensate clients. As ever justice must not only be done. But be SEEN to be done. So what about the real bad boys? Windsor Life, NPI, Resolution etc? Why do they continue to get off scot free for the appalling treatment of clients? Does it have anything to do with an ex regulator being on the board? Answers on a postcard please.

Posted by: Harry Katz

20 Jan 2010 | 11:11
Complain about this comment

£2.45m

I trust all the fine monies went towards enhancing the fund in addition to the capital injection by Standard. Or did the FSA take a slice?

Posted by: Peter Meadway

20 Jan 2010 | 14:47
Complain about this comment

Try Zurich

In my opinion the FSA knocked on the wrong door. The biggest scandal has been Zurich's Money Securities Fund. Their fund description was a little weak to say the least.

Posted by: N P

20 Jan 2010 | 16:52
Complain about this comment

Fines and Bonuses

This makes little sense. Standard c*cked up, granted, but they rectified things fairly quickly (certainly TCF), and yet the FSA STILL fine them?!? I suppose the FSA bonus pool needs to come from somewhere!

Posted by: You must be joking

20 Jan 2010 | 19:24
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints