Categories: Pensions - Retail| Pensions
Topics: FSA| Standard Life
Standard Life has been fined £2.45m by the FSA for serious failures relating to its Pension Sterling fund.
The FSA says the penalty, the first major fine of 2010, signals its intentions to crack down on regulatory breaches.
The fund became controversial in January 2009, when Standard Life made a shock 5% decrease in its valuation.
Regulators says the firm misled customers, as the product was originally sold as a ‘safe' cash fund, despite being linked to risky mortgage-backed securities (MBS).
The FSA believes systems and controls failings were responsible for the production of the misleading marketing material.
Standard Life also failed to perform a prompt and full investigation of its marketing material when concerns were raised.
The FSA acknowledged Standard Life's pro-active attempts to compensate investors, including paying £102.7m into the fund to restore its original unit price values, and its use of a third party to advice on the necessary changes to its systems and controls.
Margaret Cole, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA, says: "The FSA takes the issue of misleading financial promotions very seriously and the fine announced today demonstrates our commitment to the principle of credible deterrence.
"It is critical that consumers are given an accurate understanding of the nature of investment products and the risks involved. Without this information, consumers are unable to make informed decisions about whether investments are suitable for their individual investment strategy."
A Standard Life spokesman adds: "We have learned important lessons from this mistake and have made significant improvements to our marketing literature processes to prevent the same thing happening again."
The FSA says it will be taking a tough stance on financial promotions and marketing material in 2010.
| Share | |
| Comment | Standard Life fined £2.45m after Sterling fund debacle |
More pensions - retail news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
£2.45m
I trust all the fine monies went towards enhancing the fund in addition to the capital injection by Standard. Or did the FSA take a slice?
Posted by: Peter Meadway
Try Zurich
In my opinion the FSA knocked on the wrong door. The biggest scandal has been Zurich's Money Securities Fund. Their fund description was a little weak to say the least.
Posted by: N P
Fines and Bonuses
This makes little sense. Standard c*cked up, granted, but they rectified things fairly quickly (certainly TCF), and yet the FSA STILL fine them?!? I suppose the FSA bonus pool needs to come from somewhere!
Posted by: You must be joking
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
We all want certainty – and when it comes to auto-enrolment, advisers and their corporate...
Viewpoints
Clients now have a growing need for choice, flexibility and transparency when it comes to...
A whipping boy?
Yes, it was a mess and Standard probably deserved the fine. BUT they did make great efforts to set things right and to compensate clients. As ever justice must not only be done. But be SEEN to be done. So what about the real bad boys? Windsor Life, NPI, Resolution etc? Why do they continue to get off scot free for the appalling treatment of clients? Does it have anything to do with an ex regulator being on the board? Answers on a postcard please.
Posted by: Harry Katz