Categories: RDR
Topics: RDR| FSA| structured products
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has outlined how it will measure the success of the retail distribution review (RDR), presenting nine key indicators and setting baselines for the post-implementation review.
It will not measure the short-term success of RDR until at least two years after implementation, meaning no sooner than the end of 2014. Long-term success will not be gauged until at least 2020.
These are the indicators and the latest research the FSA will use to compare the RDR outcomes against:
Short term - from 2014
1. Firms adhere to the new landscape (e.g. describe their advice services appropriately as independent or restricted)
2. Advisers meet required standards of professionalism
3. Consumers understand the difference between independent and restricted advice
Long term - from 2020
1. Firms sell fewer products that pre-RDR currently pay high commission, sell more that currently pay little or no commission, and sell more cheaper/lower charging products
2. Consumer engagement in the market, caused by improved perception of the quality of services
3. Fewer unsuitable sales
4. Improved product persistency
5. Firms' solvency increases along with cyclically adjusted profitability
6. Unintended consequences of the RDR do not materialise or are mitigated appropriately
| Share | |
| Comment | Revealed: The FSA's nine RDR 'success indicators' |
More rdr news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Actually it was a round 10 points.
I heard that they included a tenth point which was 'Far fewer regulators and by far fewer chiefs on massive salaries, lower FSA fees, FSCS and FOS contributions.' But then I woke up.
Posted by: Neil F Liversidge
Ha!
The words "long-term success"and "FSA"cannot appear in any sentence withoutincurring mirth. Oh, by 2020 the architects of this vandalism will be long gone . . . as will most of todays IFA community.
Posted by: Alan Lakey
umm
I is good to see the have a forward bussiness plan in place, makes sure that jobs for the boys will continue i suppose!!!!!!!!!! At What COST?
Posted by: BARRY DAVIS
You are kidding me.
“Consumers understand the difference between independent and restricted advice”. When looking at the arcane rules the micro thin differences in certain aspects and the level of current debate it is fairly evident that the industry itself hasn’t got a proper handle on this – so what chance has Joe Soap? I wonder if these divisions will even still exist by 2020. Given that every few years we have a regulatory upheaval (jobs for the boys) I can envisage another all change by then.
Posted by: Harry Katz
FSA
So the fictional goal of bringing Independent Financial Advice to lower income families has been swept under the carpet now then?
Posted by: MarkG
Re-assured
It is so re-assuring to know the FSA has these success indicators in place to measure the implementation of RDR among firms. I was beginning to think they are the most arrogant professional body in the nation that doesn't listen to anyone else without a single jot of common sense, silly me!!
Posted by: Trevor
Humph
All sounds just fine and dandy, but it's still coercion by unelected unaccountable capricious functionaries, which is not acceptable in a democracy. Oh, and they are doomed on No6. But I am sure that their cod statistics department will 'prove' otherwise. No quasi-Soviet central planning agency ever has enough information or knowledge to make this sort of stuff work. And they will not count the decimation of the access to advice as an 'unintended consequence'.
Posted by: Steven Farrall
Lies and Statistics
wow...this is an interesting statistic. Demonstrates that Financial Services is not scalable which is why the big banks always have problems. Those of us who suspect that RDR is designed to help the banks are probably going to find that it has exactly the opposite affect. "RMAR data from August 2010 shows the average profit across all intermediary firms that get at least half their revenue from retail investment business is £82,566. Average capital reserves for these firms are £145,088 Among these, the firms with more than 51 advisers made an average loss of £437,249"
Posted by: Tom Scott
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
FSA indicators.
Not sure how the FSA will do this as they will no longer exist. Yes I am being sarcastic.
Posted by: terry