Revealed: The FSA's nine RDR 'success indicators'

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 15 Nov 2011 | 13:33

Categories: RDR

Topics: RDR| FSA| structured products

fsa-logo

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has outlined how it will measure the success of the retail distribution review (RDR), presenting nine key indicators and setting baselines for the post-implementation review.

It will not measure the short-term success of RDR until at least two years after implementation, meaning no sooner than the end of 2014. Long-term success will not be gauged until at least 2020.

These are the indicators and the latest research the FSA will use to compare the RDR outcomes against:

Short term - from 2014

1. Firms adhere to the new landscape (e.g. describe their advice services appropriately as independent or restricted)

  • Can only be measured once the new rules come into effect, although the FSA will asses and measure progress over the next year through surveys, roadshow events and further firm meetings

2. Advisers meet required standards of professionalism

  • According to research carried out by the FSA between July and August, 50% of advisers already held an appropriate qualification for RDR, and 39% had started studying for one
  • 91% were either already qualified or expected to qualify by December 2012; 1% expected to qualify after the end of 2012; 5% did not intend to reach the new qualification level and 4% had not given any consideration or were unsure
  • 77% of advisers indicated that they were members of a professional body
  • 81% of advisers were able to estimate the number of hours CPD completed in the last 12 months were already meeting or exceeding the future yearly requirement under the RDR (35 or more hours, of which at least 21 hours should be structured)

3. Consumers understand the difference between independent and restricted advice

  • Consumers should find it easier to understand the different types of advice available to them
  • FSA Consumer Purchasing Outcomes Survey research last year suggests 39% of recent purchasers and 42% of non-purchasers either did not know or understand the status of their adviser
  • Among recent purchasers who received multi-tied advice, 67% thought this advice was also independent; among those receiving single-tied advice, the figure was 34%

Long term - from 2020

1. Firms sell fewer products that pre-RDR currently pay high commission, sell more that currently pay little or no commission, and sell more cheaper/lower charging products

  • The regulator has been collecting data on the average amount of commission for each product area and the relative sales values for these different products.
  • It will also look at the relative activity levels within the actively and passively managed investment fund sectors

2. Consumer engagement in the market, caused by improved perception of the quality of services

  • The main consumer perception we intend to track is confidence that advisers make recommendations in the client's best interest.
  • When asked about this in June 2010, 10% agreed strongly, 28% agreed slightly, 28% neither agreed or disagreed, 19% disagreed slightly and 15% disagreed strongly

3. Fewer unsuitable sales

  • The FSA has conducted thematic reviews into five areas of investment advice over the past three years and will use the suitability of the clients' files in these cases as a baseline.
  • The area most in need of improvement was structured investment products, where 46% of reviewed files showed unsuitable sales.

4. Improved product persistency

  • If the RDR reforms are successful, the FSA expects to see an increase in product persistency levels in future years
  • In its most recent survey, Single contribution contracts generally enjoyed better persistency levels after four years, of typically 80%+ retention, than regular contribution contracts, which had a dropout rate on average of 10% a year

5. Firms' solvency increases along with cyclically adjusted profitability

  • Average total capital and reserves and average profits of firms improve as a consequence of RDR reforms
  • RMAR data from August 2010 shows the average profit across all intermediary firms that get at least half their revenue from retail investment business is £82,566. Average capital reserves for these firms are £145,088
  • Among these, the firms with more than 51 advisers made an average loss of £437,249

6. Unintended consequences of the RDR do not materialise or are mitigated appropriately

  • The FSA is monitoring for any significant changes in the numbers of and types of firms passporting into the UK to give investment advice, to circumvent full compliance with UK regulation such as the RDR rules
  • It is also closely monitoring activity around commission levels and will take "any action necessary to prevent behaviour that is not in the spirit of the RDR"

More rdr news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

FSA indicators.

Not sure how the FSA will do this as they will no longer exist. Yes I am being sarcastic.

Posted by: terry

15 Nov 2011 | 13:49
Complain about this comment

Actually it was a round 10 points.

I heard that they included a tenth point which was 'Far fewer regulators and by far fewer chiefs on massive salaries, lower FSA fees, FSCS and FOS contributions.' But then I woke up.

Posted by: Neil F Liversidge

15 Nov 2011 | 14:19
Complain about this comment

Ha!

The words "long-term success"and "FSA"cannot appear in any sentence withoutincurring mirth. Oh, by 2020 the architects of this vandalism will be long gone . . . as will most of todays IFA community.

Posted by: Alan Lakey

15 Nov 2011 | 14:24
Complain about this comment

umm

I is good to see the have a forward bussiness plan in place, makes sure that jobs for the boys will continue i suppose!!!!!!!!!! At What COST?

Posted by: BARRY DAVIS

15 Nov 2011 | 14:33
Complain about this comment

You are kidding me.

“Consumers understand the difference between independent and restricted advice”. When looking at the arcane rules the micro thin differences in certain aspects and the level of current debate it is fairly evident that the industry itself hasn’t got a proper handle on this – so what chance has Joe Soap? I wonder if these divisions will even still exist by 2020. Given that every few years we have a regulatory upheaval (jobs for the boys) I can envisage another all change by then.

Posted by: Harry Katz

15 Nov 2011 | 14:45
Complain about this comment

FSA

So the fictional goal of bringing Independent Financial Advice to lower income families has been swept under the carpet now then?

Posted by: MarkG

15 Nov 2011 | 14:47
Complain about this comment

Re-assured

It is so re-assuring to know the FSA has these success indicators in place to measure the implementation of RDR among firms. I was beginning to think they are the most arrogant professional body in the nation that doesn't listen to anyone else without a single jot of common sense, silly me!!

Posted by: Trevor

15 Nov 2011 | 16:04
Complain about this comment

Humph

All sounds just fine and dandy, but it's still coercion by unelected unaccountable capricious functionaries, which is not acceptable in a democracy. Oh, and they are doomed on No6. But I am sure that their cod statistics department will 'prove' otherwise. No quasi-Soviet central planning agency ever has enough information or knowledge to make this sort of stuff work. And they will not count the decimation of the access to advice as an 'unintended consequence'.

Posted by: Steven Farrall

15 Nov 2011 | 16:51
Complain about this comment

Lies and Statistics

wow...this is an interesting statistic. Demonstrates that Financial Services is not scalable which is why the big banks always have problems. Those of us who suspect that RDR is designed to help the banks are probably going to find that it has exactly the opposite affect. "RMAR data from August 2010 shows the average profit across all intermediary firms that get at least half their revenue from retail investment business is £82,566. Average capital reserves for these firms are £145,088 Among these, the firms with more than 51 advisers made an average loss of £437,249"

Posted by: Tom Scott

16 Nov 2011 | 08:44
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints