Categories: Regulation| Regulation
Topics: Money Advice Service| House of Lords| Parliament
Financial secretary Mark Hoban has defended the Money Advice Service after a prominent peer launched an attack on pay levels at the organisation.
At an evidence hearing for the Joint Committee on the Draft Financial Services Bill yesterday, Lord McFall quizzed Hoban over high pay levels at the service at a time when it is on the verge of almost halving its staff from 150.
McFall said: "Here is a body looking for financial inclusion and you've got a chief executive on £350,000, twice the Prime Minister, for a staff in the New Year of 77.
"I'm informed three directors have been appointed in the last eight or nine months on six figure salaries as well.
"Given there is a gap in the market, particularly after RDR, is there not a case for you getting the NAO [National Audit Office] to look at the value for money element to ensure this organisation is fit to give people financial advice and ensure the objectives are satisfied?"
Hoban said it was already the view of management that the organisation "as currently structured doesn't deliver its objectives".
He also highlighted the powers of the NAO over the regulators under the proposed regime.
The Treasury secretary said he was a "great supporter" of MAS.
"I think it's absolutely vital if we are to engage consumers much more with budgeting, getting to know their financial needs, finding the products to meet those needs, " Hoban said.
But he said the service must think about "how it maximises its reach" and engage with as many people as possible.
During the session, Hoban also repeated his commitment to the early publication of warning notices under the new regulatory regime.
"I'm very keen to see the powers that are in the bill around the publication of warning notices. It's right that consumers should know if someone's got to that point in the enforcement process."
| Share | |
| Comment | Hoban defends MAS as McFall criticises CEO's £350k pay |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Well said Lord McFall
I agree with Lord McFall. How anyone can justify a salary of £350K with only 77 employees who product nothing that brings in any revenue staggers me. Yet again the industry is being abused as we have, as far as I can see, no say in the matter at all, we just have to pay. How mr Hoban can support such a salary staggers me especially as he is Financial Secretary to the Treasury but as this service is not finded by the taxpayer but all those in the industry he probably cares little. Yet again we are being abused by a system of regulation that is so far out of touch with reality they know they can do what they like as no one can touch them as the TSC keeps finding out.
Posted by: Michael Fallas
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
There must be a mistake
£350,000 p.a.? That cannot be correct surely, or is there no limit to the length of the snout that gorges on the trough of other peoples money. Where's the accountability? Scandalous at a time that executive remuneration is (quite rightly in many cases)under such severe scrutiny and criticism.
Posted by: Duncan Carter