FSA funding levy jumps 16%, but advisers will pay less

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 02 Feb 2012 | 13:40

Categories: Regulation| Regulation

Topics: FSA| Fees| levy| FSCS| FOS| Money Advice Service

fsa-logo

Advice firms will pay £38.4m towards funding the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in 2012/13, the regulator proposed today.

Consulting on its fees and levies for the year, the regulator said it will have an overall funding requirement (AFR) of £578.4m, up from £500.5m in 2011/12, a gross increase of 15.6%.

However, the levy for the A13 advisory block - for firms which do not hold client money - is down to £38.4m from £39.7m last year, a fall of 3.4%.

The minimum fee for small firms has been kept at £1,000, and the FSA said the largest firms will bare the brunt of the increase in total AFR.

This is likely to be the FSA's final funding requirement before it splits into the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) next year, and Hector Sants, the FSA chief executive, said this explained the increase in overall funding.

"Much of the increase in AFR is the result of the additional resources needed to implement the new regulatory structure but these costs for the restructuring are in line with government forecasts," he said.

With the annual levy for the Financial Ombudsman Service down from £42.7m to £17.7m, firms will £10.00 per relevant approved person, instead of the £30.02 they paid this year, although they will still be subject to a minimum levy of £35.

Most of the funding for the Ombudsman come from case fees and the it recently announced plans to introduce a supplementary case fee of £350 for cases involving the mis-selling of PPI.

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

reduced fees small business

IN TIMES OF AUSTERITY CREDIT HAS TO BE GIVEN TO THE FSA WHEN DUE AND ANY REDUCTIONIN FEES IS A POSITIVE THING

Posted by: KEVIN FLETCHER

02 Feb 2012 | 14:07
Complain about this comment

I AGREE

I agree. Well done FSA. I have a feeling this will be the least commented on article for a while!

Posted by: Disgruntled

02 Feb 2012 | 15:19
Complain about this comment

Do the math

They forgot to mention the fact that there will be far fewer advisers around to pay the reduced levy, resulting in higher fees for those that remain.

Posted by: LOL

02 Feb 2012 | 16:00
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints