FSA visits confirm concerns over small SIPP firms: Defaqto

Author: Rachel Dalton
Retirement Planner | 15 Sep 2011 | 10:15

Categories: SIPPs

Topics: SIPP| Defaqto| FSA| John Moret

fsa-logo

The Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) inspection of eight SIPP providers shows it is concerned over levels of risk among small providers, a Defaqto expert says.

The FSA confirmed yesterday it is continuing its review of the SIPP market with inspections of eight providers, in order to "learn how the market has changed over the last few years".

The inspections did not come as a surprise to industry figures. John Moret, director of MoreToSIPPs, said: "I expected the FSA would be following up on their questionnaire, issued earlier this year, at some point."

Andy Leggett, insight analyst at Defaqto, said the FSA's activity in the SIPP market is welcome because the regulator "will be able to go further and see more than IFAs" when it comes to due diligence on providers.

He said there is a definite shift towards providers carrying out more due diligence on investment themselves, rather than leaving this to the IFA or clients.

"The FSA is not going to announce what it is looking for, but it is focussing on small providers as it is more concerned about them," he said. "The FSA sees relatively higher risks among small providers, although that does not mean smaller providers are bad or more risky as a rule.

"There is a critical mass needed to be a SIPP provider; you need a certain number of people and a big enough knowledge base because these investments are potentially very complex."

 

More from retirement planner

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Clarification

Rachel, allow me to clarify/develop a point if I may. Providers should be accepting part of the responsibility for vetting investments such as to see if it is allowable for SIPPs, not taxable property for instance. They may wish to go further and consider how robust the investment is, particularly in the case of complex investments such as some UCISs. This is in no way to try to determine investment performance but to consider the risk of collapse. Such a detailed level of investment due diligence may very well be increasingly outsourced, particularly by smaller and medium sized SIPP providers (and perhaps advisers) rather than trying to retain that level of investment expertise in-house.

Posted by: Andy Leggett

15 Sep 2011 | 13:14
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints